|
Catalog Number DL950F |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Material Deformation (2976)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 07/31/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that prior to filter placement procedure, the tip was allegedly found damaged upon unpacking of the filter.There was no patient contact.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us, but is similar to the denali filter products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510k number for the denali filter products is identified in d2 and g4.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history record is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, photos were provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 12/2025).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device pending return.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that prior to filter placement procedure, the tip was allegedly found to be damaged upon unpacking of the filter.There was no patient contact.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us, but is similar to the denali filter products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510k number for the denali filter products is identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one denali femoral delivery system kit was returned, and two photos were provided and reviewed.Both the photos show the customer holding the introducer sheath which is seen broken.No other anomalies noted.During visual evaluation of the returned device, the distal tip of dilator was noted to be damaged.The introducer sheath was not returned.No other anomalies found.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported break as the introducer sheath was seen broken.Additionally, material deformation is identified as the distal tip of dilator was noted damaged.A definitive root cause for the reported break and identified material deformation could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiry date: 12/2025), g3, h6 (device).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|