A facility reported that the mayfield modified skull clamp (a1059) was installed in supine, tightened at position 3,5.The patient was returned and after reversal, when they wanted to fixed the skull clamp on the support, there was slippage of the head inside the "arc" with skull clamp tightened at position 0,5.The patient had wound on the scalp, and a 2nd device was used to complete the procedure.No delay was reported.
|
Updated fields: d4, d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6, h10 mayfield modified skull clamp (a1059) was returned for evaluation: failure analysis - investigation of the returned unit showed that the unit had a sticking swivel lock assembly, and a residue buildup was present.Some worn off internal parts were required to adjust the swivel lock assembly, along with general maintenance and cleaning.To resolve all issues, the base was replaced along with the required internal parts, and the swivel lock assembly was assembled and adjusted.A successful function test was performed and the unit was marked.Root cause - the complaint is confirmed via inspection of the unit.The unit required replacement of worn internal parts and the base casting was replaced due to worn starburst teeth.Probable root cause is routine use and wear.Additionally, improper or suboptimal placement of the skull clamp can contribute to movement or slippage of the patient.No further investigation is required based on the acceptability of risk and no adverse trends were identified.This will be monitored and trended going forward.At present, we consider this complaint to be closed.
|