It was reported that during a filter placement procedure with venous thrombus in the lower extremity, the filter was allegedly stuck at the tip of the sheath and unable to advance.It was further reported that the filter allegedly failed to remove.Furthermore, the surgeon had to cut off the propeller ultimately and removed the problematic filter.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us, but is similar to the denali filter products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510k number for the denali filter products is identified in d2 and g4.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.However, a photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 04/2025) h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us, but is similar to the denali filter products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510k number for the denali filter products is identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: one denali femoral filter and delivery system kit was returned, and one photo was provided and reviewed.The photo shows the introducer sheath, touhy-borst adapter and filter storage tube were connected, and pusher catheter was noted to be kinked.Visual evaluation of the returned device showed the introducer sheath was attached to the touhy/storage tube and deformed tip of the storage tube was identified.During functional test, storage tube was removed from the sheath and under microscopic examination filter was noted within and filter was deployed by an in-house mandrel.All limbs were present and uncrossed.The pusher wire was noted to be detached.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the identified detachment and the material deformation issues.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported activation, position or separation problem issue and difficult to remove issue.A definitive root cause for the reported activation, position or separation problem, difficult to remove and identified detachment and the material deformation issue could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: b5, d4 (expiry date: 04/2025).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
It was reported that during a filter placement procedure with venous thrombus in the lower extremity, the filter was allegedly stuck at the tip of the sheath and unable to be advanced further.It was further reported that the filter was allegedly failed to be removed either.Furthermore, the surgeon had to cut off the propeller ultimately and removed the problematic filter.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|