• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SEPTODONT SAS BIODENTINE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SEPTODONT SAS BIODENTINE Back to Search Results
Lot Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Abscess (1690); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Spontaneous report, from belgium.Agency reference id: (b)(4).Local reference # (b)(4).Linked with local reference # (b)(4) (same reporter, same suspect product, same reported adr, different identifiable patient).Initial information received on 13-feb-2020 from dentist via dealer.Follow-up #1 information received on 23-feb-2020, follow-up #2 information received on 24-feb-2020 and follow-up #3 information received on 28-feb-2020 from dentist.All information were integrated in case narrative below.The dentist reported that a 8-year-old female patient, had been treated with the suspect device biodentine (batch #: b23279, expiration date: jun-2020) for pulpotomy on vital tooth #54 (milk tooth) in (b)(6) 2019.At the end of 2019, the patient had a huge abscess, went to the emergency room and was hospitalized with antibiotics on an infusion for 2 days and the tooth was extracted.The dentist did not see the patient at this moment.The dentist never reported such a serious infectious problem after a pulpotomy she had performed.She decided to stop the use of the product in milk teeth and will continue to use it on definitive teeth.The dentist considered this case as serious.No further information expected.No sample available for analysis from the reporter.
=
follow-up #1: incident form was received on 23-feb-2020 follow-up #2: dentist sent the correct batch number.Follow-up #3: dentist sent additional information (adr, patient data.).Causality assessment on 12-mar-2020 by al on initial information received on 13-feb-2020 and on additional information received on 23-feb-2020, 24-feb-2020 and 28-feb-2020.Re-evaluated on 11-sep-2020 by fl following internal review.A.Seriousness: serious (hospitalisation).B.Expectedness: tooth abscess: unexpected be.Tooth extraction: unexpected be.C.Causality: a) latency - compatible.B) recognized association - no.C) analysis - the pulpotomy procedure success depends on many factor: the correct indication and pulp status at the time of the treatment, the condition of procedure conduct and the control made periodically to avoid superinfection and situation such as dental abcess.In this case the patient experienced dental abcess with no further precising on pulp status, treatment and follow up visit.The causality of biodentine cannot be excluded and is assessed as possible.No other claims have been registered on the batch except 1 linked case reported by the same practitioner, no capa is required.D) dechallenge - na.E) rechallenge - na.Concluded causality who: possible.On 11-sep-2020: assessment changed from unlikely to possible following internal review.Following internal review, medical devices vigilance case reports have been updated with imdrf dictionary codes on 12-july-2021.Manufacturer's initial comments: no sample available for analysis.Not available from the reporter.No other claims have been registered on the batch except 1 linked case reported by the same practitioner, no capa is required.Manufacturer's final comments: no other claims have been registered on the batch except 1 linked case reported by the same practitioner, no capa is required.No sample available for analysis.No investigation result available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer's initial comments: no sample available for analysis.Not available from the reporter.No other claims have been registered on the batch except 1 linked case reported by the same practitioner, no capa is required.Manufacturer's final comments: no other claims have been registered on the batch except 1 linked case reported by the same practitioner, no capa is required.No sample available for analysis.No investigation result available.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIODENTINE
Type of Device
BIODENTINE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SEPTODONT SAS
58, rue du pont de creteil
saint maur, cedex val-de-marne, 94100
FR  94100
Manufacturer (Section G)
SEPTODONT S.A.S.
58, rue du pont de creteil
saint maur, cedex val-de-marne 94100
Manufacturer Contact
58, rue du pont de creteil
saint maur, cedex val-de-marne, 94100
MDR Report Key17633445
MDR Text Key322088715
Report Number9610964-2023-00015
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KIF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBE
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Dentist
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/28/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/13/2020
Initial Date FDA Received08/28/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age8 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-