• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH UNKNOWN_GMRS FEMORAL STEM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH UNKNOWN_GMRS FEMORAL STEM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_LIM
Device Problems Loss of Osseointegration (2408); Osseointegration Problem (3003); Migration (4003)
Patient Problems Ambulation Difficulties (2544); Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
Event Date 07/13/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event Description
Patient was revised due to "aseptic loosening and subsidence of a revision distal femoral replacement.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding loosening & subsidence involving an unknown gmrs femoral stem was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: material analysis, visual, functional and dimensional inspections could not be performed as the device was not returned.Clinician review: a review of medical records with a clinical consultant indicated "this case concerns a 70 year old female who at some point underwent a distal femoral replacement of the right knee with a rotating hinge component and gmrs implant.The implant loosened and subsided and was revised changing part of the components.About one month later the patient underwent revision for a periprosthetic fracture above the femoral implant.I can confirm that the patient had a revision procedure of the right distal femoral replacement implant and also the re-revision procedure for periprosthetic fracture since i was able to review operation reports and x-rays.The root cause of this event cannot be determined with certainty.The causes of loosening of a distal femoral replacement rotating hinge prosthesis are multifactorial including surgical technique factors including cement technique, patient factors including bone quality, activity level and bmi.The causes of periprosthetic fracture are likewise multifactorial including surgical technique especially the reaming process which could theoretically remove enough cortical bone to weaken the femur allowing for fracture upon weight-bearing, patient factors including bone quality, activity level and bmi, as well as possible trauma.No trauma was related in this history.I would not assign any causality to the implant itself.'.Product history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Complaint history review: could not be performed as the device lot details were not provided.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to loosening & subsidence of the gmrs femoral stem.A review of medical records with a clinical consultant indicated "this case concerns a 70 year old female who at some point underwent a distal femoral replacement of the right knee with a rotating hinge component and gmrs implant.The implant loosened and subsided and was revised changing part of the components.About one month later the patient underwent revision for a periprosthetic fracture above the femoral implant.I can confirm that the patient had a revision procedure of the right distal femoral replacement implant and also the re-revision procedure for periprosthetic fracture since i was able to review operation reports and x-rays.The root cause of this event cannot be determined with certainty.The causes of loosening of a distal femoral replacement rotating hinge prosthesis are multifactorial including surgical technique factors including cement technique, patient factors including bone quality, activity level and bmi.The causes of periprosthetic fracture are likewise multifactorial including surgical technique especially the reaming process which could theoretically remove enough cortical bone to weaken the femur allowing for fracture upon weight-bearing, patient factors including bone quality, activity level and bmi, as well as possible trauma.No trauma was related in this history.I would not assign any causality to the implant itself." no further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Event Description
Patient was revised due to "aseptic loosening and subsidence of a revision distal femoral replacement.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN_GMRS FEMORAL STEM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-LIMERICK
raheen business park
limerick NA
EI   NA
Manufacturer Contact
anna ryan
raheen business park
limerick NA
EI   NA
61498200
MDR Report Key17642059
MDR Text Key322171309
Report Number0002249697-2023-00963
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_LIM
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/13/2023
Initial Date FDA Received08/29/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/12/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/07/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age70 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight100 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
-
-