|
Catalog Number THP-M |
Device Problem
Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 08/08/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
An turbohawk plus atherectomy device was being used for treatment of a 80mm plaque lesion with 70% stenosis in the mid distal region of the superficial femoral artery.The artery was 6mm in diameter with mild tortuosity and calcification.The device was inspected and prepped as per the ifu with no issues identified.It was reported after one e pass of the atherectomy catheter, the tech noted that the thumb switch was unable to fully close to the off position.The tech had tried to toggle the thumb switch on and off multiple times and still noted the ¿spongy¿ feeling when attempting to turn the thumb switch to the off position.The cutter was not fully in the off position; therefore it was not entirely inside the housing during removal.The tech had forward tension on the thumb switch to keep the device from turning on accidentally during removal.The physician attempted the same steps with no success before removing the device to clean.The device was safely removed from the patient.No deformation was noted in the cutter.After cleaning the device per ifu, the same issue was noted of not being able to fully close the thumb switch.During inspection, no abnormalities, or pieces of the cutter were noted to be missing.The physician opened a new turbohawk, prepped and inspected per ifu, and was able to complete the case with no further issues.No patient injury was reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|