• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 MARATHON; CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 MARATHON; CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH Back to Search Results
Model Number UNK-NV-MARATHON
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 11/01/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Yabuzaki h, terada t, tsumoto t, et al.Transarterial embolization in dural arteriovenous fistulas under sinus balloon protection using the shouryu supercompliant balloon.Interdisciplinary neurosurgery: advanced techniques and case management.2022;27.Doi:10.1016/j.Inat.2021.101415.Medtronic literature review found a report of patient complications in association with onyx and the marathon microcatheter.The purpose of this article was to  report the efficacy of the supercompliant shouryu balloon catheter for intrasinus balloon protection while preserving the normal venous outlet.  eighteen patients with dural arteriovenous fistulas who were treated with transarterial embolization under intrasinus balloon protection between april 2011 and july 2020 were included.Nine men and nine women were treated, and their average age was 61.1 years.Each patient received 5000 iu of heparin after sheath puncture.A 7-fr or 8-fr guiding catheter was navigated into the common carotid or external carotid artery via the transfemoral route, and selective angiography was performed using a 4-fr catheter.After the target vessel was decided on using selective angiography, a microcatheter was navigated into the target artery through the intermediate catheter, as close as possible to the shunt point, and advanced to the wedged position.A defrictor nano catheter (medico¿s (b)(6) japan) or marathon (medtronic) was usually used, but when the target feeder was wide and difficult to wedge using these catheters, they used a double-lumen balloon catheter, scepterc (microvention, tustin, ca, usa), for the onyx injection.On the venous side, a 6-fr introducer sheath was cannulated transfemorally or transjugularly.A 6-fr guiding catheter was then navigated into the dural sinus.The balloon catheter was subsequently navigated to the position where all shunts were open into the sinus.A 7-fr sheath and a 7-fr guiding catheter were used when two balloon catheters were needed.The tip of the guiding catheter was positioned adjacent to the proximal portion of the balloon to prevent migration of the balloon during inflation.The balloon was also pulled slightly to avoid migration.The balloon was then carefully inflated to occlude all shunts without obliterating the normal venous drainage r oute, such as the vein of labbe.If the normal drainage route was occluded with shunt points, the balloon was deflated after several minutes of occlusion.Onyx was injected intermittently during this period.When the targeted sinus could not be occluded by a single balloon, two balloon catheters were used in a parallel fashion.When occlusion of the feeders was observed, the onyx injection was completed and the balloon on the venous side was deflated.Angiography was then performed, and if residual shunt flow was observed, an additional onyx injection was given from the residual feeding artery.The following technical issues were noted: -the microcatheter tip was detached at a length of 1 in.During catheter retrieval after onyx injection, and the tip of the microcatheter was buried in the onyx cast in 1 patient.No neurological sequelae related to the complication.The following intra- or post-procedural outcomes were noted: -complete (n= 9) or near-complete (n = 4) occlusion was achieved in 72.2% of the patients.Partial occlusion was observed in five cases, and additional treatment was needed in only one case -pulsatile tinnitus disappeared in nine patients, but additional treatment was necessary for three patients because of residual tinnitus after endovascular surgery.-the symptoms of a patient with visual disturbance were resolved after the first treatment session, but the patient did not completely recover.The symptoms were not aggravated after the treatment -periprocedural complications were observed in 2 patients.Middle meningeal artery dissection due to catheter insertion was observed in a single patient.The microcatheter tip was detached at a length of 1 in.During catheter retrieval after onyx injection, and the tip of the microcatheter was buried in the onyx cast in 1 patient.No neurological sequelae related to these complications were observed related to these complications.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: product id unk-nv-onyx.Product id unk-nv-marathon.Product id unk-nv-onyx.G2: citation: authors: yabuzaki, h., terada, t., tsumoto, t., matsuda, y., tanaka, y., nakayama, s., nishiyama, a., tetsuo, y.Transarterial embolization in dural arteriovenous fistulas under sinus balloon protection using the shouryu supercompliant balloon.Interdisciplinary neurosurgery: advanced techniques and case 2022.Doi:10.1016/j.Inat.2021.101415 earliest date of publication used for date of event no unique device identifier (serial/lot) numbers were provided; without this information it could not be determined whether these observations have been previously reported.Without return of the product no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observations.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
 
Event Description
Additional information received reported that the catheter tip remained: it is unknown which mc was used, however, it is not certain that there is a possibility of marathon; the tip was caught in the onyx18's cast and broke, but it was buried in that cast, so it was not considered a major adverse event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MARATHON
Type of Device
CATHETER, CONTINUOUS FLUSH
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key17649879
MDR Text Key322267510
Report Number2029214-2023-01523
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K202318
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/18/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/30/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNK-NV-MARATHON
Device Catalogue NumberUNK-NV-MARATHON
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/22/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
SEE H10.
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age61 YR
-
-