• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: UNKNOWN ROTAREX; THROMBECTOMY & ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

UNKNOWN ROTAREX; THROMBECTOMY & ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 80236
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Perforation of Vessels (2135)
Event Date 06/30/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H10: nicolas w.Shammas, james t.Torey, and w.John shammas (2018).Dissections in peripheral vascular interventions: a proposed classification using intravascular ultrasound.Journal of invasive cardiology, 30(4): 145-146.H10: d4 (expiration date: 07/2024).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported in an article in the journal of ¿intensive cardiology¿ titled ¿dissections in peripheral vascular interventions: a proposed classification using intravascular ultrasound", that after two runs of device in the occluded right distal superficial femoral artery, the patient reportedly had vessel perforation.It was further reported that the patient underwent additional medical intervention for bail-out stent placement with post-dilatation.Reportedly, the patient was recovered with zero percent final residual narrowing.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported in an article in the journal of ¿invasive cardiology¿ titled ¿dissections in peripheral vascular interventions: a proposed classification using intravascular ultrasound", that after two runs of device in the occluded right distal superficial femoral artery, the patient reportedly experienced vessel perforation.It was further reported that the patient underwent additional medical intervention for bail-out stent placement with post-dilatation.Reportedly, the patient was recovered with zero percent final residual narrowing.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing-related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical sample was not returned for evaluation and a physical investigation was not possible.The user report and provided image contains information regarding catheter mechanical jam.Due to no sample the failure mode cannot be confirmed.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure.A clear root cause could not be identified but a blockage of the catheter represents a known inherent risk.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: nicolas w.Shammas, james t.Torey, and w.John shammas (2018).Dissections in peripheral vascular interventions: a proposed classification using intravascular ultrasound.Journal of invasive cardiology, 30(4): 145-146.H10: d4 (expiration date: 07/2024), g3, h6 (method).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported in an article in the journal of ¿invasive cardiology¿ titled ¿dissections in peripheral vascular interventions: a proposed classification using intravascular ultrasound", that after two runs of device in the occluded right distal superficial femoral artery, the patient reportedly experienced vessel perforation.It was further reported that the patient underwent additional medical intervention for bail-out stent placement with post-dilatation.Reportedly, the patient was recovered with zero percent final residual narrowing.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing-related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical sample was not returned for evaluation and a physical investigation was not possible.The user report and provided image contains information regarding catheter mechanical jam.Due to no sample the failure mode cannot be confirmed.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure.A clear root cause could not be identified but a blockage of the catheter represents a known inherent risk.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.H10: nicolas w.Shammas, james t.Torey, and w.John shammas (2018).Dissections in peripheral vascular interventions: a proposed classification using intravascular ultrasound.Journal of invasive cardiology, 30(4): 145-146.H10: d4 (expiration date: 07/2024), g3.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTAREX
Type of Device
THROMBECTOMY & ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
UNKNOWN
BR 
Manufacturer (Section G)
UNKNOWN
BR  
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key17697217
MDR Text Key322799366
Report Number3008439199-2023-00145
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K211738
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/07/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number80236
Device Lot Number220500
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/07/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-