• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION VIGILANT X4 CRT-D; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION VIGILANT X4 CRT-D; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number G247
Device Problems Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Premature Discharge of Battery (1057); Low impedance (2285); High Capture Threshold (3266)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 07/19/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that this system with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) and a left ventricular (lv) lead has been showing an abnormal power consumption.Also, the lv lead showed low, out of range pacing values and thresholds significantly elevated.The physician was concerned about lv lead having moved or a possible dislodgement or pull back.The lv lead was reprogrammed in clinic to a different vector and the output decreased.Additionally, there are also presenting electrogram (egm) deflections on the lv channel seen but not sensed during atrial paced events.It appears that an lv lead revision is being planned but it was recommended to explant the crt-d as well.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that this system with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) and a left ventricular (lv) lead has been showing an abnormal power consumption.Also, the lv lead showed low, out of range pacing values and thresholds significantly elevated.The physician was concerned about lv lead having moved or a possible dislodgement or pull back.The lv lead was reprogrammed in clinic to a different vector and the output decreased.Additionally, there are also presenting electrogram (egm) deflections on the lv channel seen but not sensed during atrial paced events.It appears that an lv lead revision is being planned but it was recommended to explant the crt-d as well.At this time both the crt-d and the lv lead have been explanted at a surgical intervention.The crt-d had an additional allegation of premature battery depletion and along with the lv, they have been returned for analysis.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that this system with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) and a left ventricular (lv) lead has been showing an abnormal power consumption.Also, the lv lead showed low, out of range pacing values and thresholds significantly elevated.The physician was concerned about lv lead having moved or a possible dislodgement or pull back.The lv lead was reprogrammed in clinic to a different vector and the output decreased.Additionally, there are also presenting electrogram (egm) deflections on the lv channel seen but not sensed during atrial paced events.It appears that an lv lead revision is being planned but it was recommended to explant the crt-d as well.At this time both the crt-d and the lv lead have been explanted at a surgical intervention.The crt-d and the lv have been returned for analysis.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event Description
It was reported that this system with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) and a left ventricular (lv) lead has been showing an abnormal power consumption.Also, the lv lead showed low, out of range pacing values and thresholds significantly elevated.The physician was concerned about lv lead having moved or a possible dislodgement or pull back.The lv lead was reprogrammed in clinic to a different vector and the output decreased.Additionally, there are also presenting electrogram (egm) deflections on the lv channel seen but not sensed during atrial paced events.It appears that an lv lead revision is being planned but it was recommended to explant the crt-d as well.At this time both the crt-d and the lv lead have been explanted at a surgical intervention.The crt-d had an additional allegation of premature battery depletion and along with the lv, they have been returned for analysis.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, a thorough evaluation of the product was performed.Review of device memory confirmed the presence of a higher than normal current drain condition.Electrical testing and analysis were then conducted, which isolated the high current to an anomaly in an oxide layer within a custom integrated circuit component.This anomaly caused a high current drain, which over time resulted in the reported clinical observations.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VIGILANT X4 CRT-D
Type of Device
CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key17727000
MDR Text Key323154576
Report Number2124215-2023-49557
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIK
UDI-Device Identifier00802526589287
UDI-Public00802526589287
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/23/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberG247
Device Catalogue NumberG247
Device Lot Number300052
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/22/2023
Initial Date FDA Received09/12/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/11/2023
09/11/2023
11/16/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/02/2023
10/08/2023
11/23/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/13/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age72 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-