• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number SIGTRSB60AXT
Device Problems Material Rupture (1546); Separation Failure (2547); Failure to Form Staple (2579)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Tissue Breakdown (2681)
Event Date 08/23/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic single anastomosis duodenal-ileal (sadi) bariatric surgery, during the first firing on the stomach antrum, the stapler fired uneventfully, without a problem.The knife blade returned, and the jaws opened without an issue.When removing the opened staple load from the tissue, the entire reinforcement material on the anvil side peeled off from the staple line and was remained attached to the staple reload.Upon further inspection, the distal retaining suture on the anvil side did not cut with the knife blade.It appeared that the deployed staples pulled through the trs when the stapler was being removed.Some staples did not form completely when the reinforcement malfunctioned.There was slightly more bleeding than normal, which was touched up with cautery.Surgeon chose to over sew the staple line with a 3/0 suture to imbricate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was not returned, but a photo was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted one device opened and outside of its packaging.The jaws were open and the staple pushers were up distally.The distal cartridge suture was attached and the cartridge side reinforcement material was loose.The material was partially torn and a piece appeared missing.Holes were noted in the reinforcement material and tissue appeared sutured.A piece of material could be seen in the jaws and staple formation was difficult to see due to image quality.It was reported that the staples did not form as expected.The reported issue could not be confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.It was also reported that after firing, the reinforcement material did not release from the device as expected and the reinforcement material was torn.The reported issues were confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medt ronic quality specifications.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRI-STAPLE 2.0
Type of Device
STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott rd
north haven CT 06473
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott rd
north haven CT 06473
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key17730877
MDR Text Key323205034
Report Number1219930-2023-03848
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GDW
UDI-Device Identifier10884521717633
UDI-Public10884521717633
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K173270
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/12/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberSIGTRSB60AXT
Device Catalogue NumberSIGTRSB60AXT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/12/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/12/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-