• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJOHUNTLEIGH, A BRANCH OF ARJO LTD MED AB NIMBUS 3 / DFS3; MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJOHUNTLEIGH, A BRANCH OF ARJO LTD MED AB NIMBUS 3 / DFS3; MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE Back to Search Results
Model Number 152010DAR
Device Problem Deflation Problem (1149)
Patient Problem Pressure Sores (2326)
Event Date 06/16/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
On august 17, 2023 arjo received an information from the national agency for the safety of medicines and health products (ansm) informing about the event involving nimbus 3 mattress.It was reported that, on the morning of (b)(6) 2023, the 79-year-old tetraplegic patient was found lying on the deflated mattress.It is not known how long the mattress was deflated.The customer staff reported that the patient¿s sacrum pressure injury deteriorated from stage 2 to stage 4.When the issue was noticed, the mattress was changed immediately.On (b)(6) 2023 the claimed system was subjected to preventive maintenance.It was found that the mattress foot cell was punctured.The arjo technician replaced the faulty part.There was no indication about any alarm issue on the pump.The customer did not inform arjo about an incident in (b)(6), therefore the device was not inspected then.The device was a month later verified as part of preventive maintenance program.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation completion is ongoing.A supplemental report will be submitted when investigation is completed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The nimbus 3 instruction for use (151996) states that the involved system is equipped with a sophisticated alarm system that differentiates between normal operation and genuine system faults.The pump worked correctly (no parts were replaced) which means that if a low pressure was detected, an indicator would illuminate on the top and front of the pump and an audible warning would be heard.The alarm system activates after the system detects lower pressure in the mattress.In the event of one cell being punctured, the mattress will not lost pressure immediately.The mattress consists of 20 cells in total.Torso cells are located under the middle section of the mattress and are fed through partial non-return valves from other cells and are therefore never at zero pressure.Their role is to prevent torso section from bottoming during dynamic mode and when a patient is sitting upright.Additionally, the pressure injuries are complex and are a result of many factors including: advanced age, immobility, co-morbidities, microclimate, incontinence and lack of being turned or repositioned frequently enough.A support surface is only one of many interventions that are needed in order to prevent pressure injuries.It is unknown whether the therapy regimen has been adapted to the tetraplegic patient¿s condition who would not be able to reposition himself.Based on the above the root cause of this event could not be established.The arjo nimbus 3 system was used while the patient's condition deteriorated, therefore it played a role in the event.The involved system malfunctioned therefore it failed to meet its performance specification, however it is unknown when the foot cell became punctured.Arjo was not notified about an event when it occurred and the mattress was inspected a month later as part of preventive maintenance program.The complaint was assessed as reportable due to the initial indication that the patient developed serious pressure injury allegedly while lying on the arjo system.However, the investigation concluded that the relation between pi development and the use of arjo device was not found.
 
Event Description
On august 17, 2023 arjo received an information from the national agency for the safety of medicines and health products (ansm) informing about the event involving nimbus 3 mattress.Following the information provided, the 79-year-old tetraplegic patient was found lying on the deflated mattress on the morning of (b)(6) 2023.It is not known how long the mattress was deflated.The customer staff reported that the patient¿s sacrum pressure injury deteriorated from stage 2 to stage 4.When the issue was noticed, the mattress was changed immediately.On 11 july 2023, the claimed system was subjected to preventive maintenance.It was found that the mattress foot cell was punctured, however it is unknown when the foot cell became punctured.Arjo inspected that mattress a month after the event.The arjo technician replaced the faulty part.There was no indication of any alarm issue on the pump.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NIMBUS 3 / DFS3
Type of Device
MATTRESS, AIR FLOTATION, ALTERNATING PRESSURE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH, A BRANCH OF ARJO LTD MED AB
arjohuntleigh house, houghton hall business park
houghton regis, bedfordshire LU5 5 XF
UK  LU5 5XF
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH, A BRANCH OF ARJO LTD MED AB
arjohuntleigh house, houghton hall business park
houghton regis, bedfordshire LU5 5 XF
UK   LU5 5XF
Manufacturer Contact
katarzyna bobrow
ks. wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki 62-05-2
PL   62-052
668046472
MDR Report Key17753991
MDR Text Key323474150
Report Number3005619970-2023-00020
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FNM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/22/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/15/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number152010DAR
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/17/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-