• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 3; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 3; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT Back to Search Results
Model Number VIO 3
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694)
Event Date 08/28/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a patient incident occurred with an electrosurgical unit (esu/generator).The account didn't know which esu was used in the procedure [note: it could also have been esu model vio 3, part number (p/n): 10160-000, serial number: (b)(6)].Nevertheless, one of the generators was used to remove a testicular tumor.The esu was used with an erbe slim line electrode handle [p/n: 20190-067, lot number (l/n): information not provided (ni)] and bipolar forceps (manufacturer information: ni).A neutral electrode from the asmuth company (p/n: asne02, l/n: ni) was attached to the left thigh of the patient.Specific information involving the settings of the esu was not provided.During the procedure, a 5 cm2 burn (redness, blistering) occurred in the right groin of the patient.The wound was cooled and dressed.Further medical intervention was not needed, and the hospital stay was not prolonged.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Both esus from the account were inspected/tested (note: the involved instruments and accessory were not made available for an examination.).The units were found to be working as intended.The evaluation of each included an electrical safety check, a functional check of each of the equipment's features and a power output check.The generators were/are within specifications and all features were/are functioning properly.In addition, no anomalies were found in the device history record (dhr) of either device.In conclusion, no erbe equipment problem was found that would have caused or contributed to the incident.Based upon the limited information provided, most likely the burn/necrosis was caused by leakage current.Presumably, the patient's testicle was on a surgical drape that was wet from disinfectant and blood.Electricity may have leaked to the patient's skin via the drape and caused the necrosis.The possibility of hf leakage current in connection with wet cloth causing a burn is a warning in the esu's user manual.However, no conclusive determination could be made as to the cause of the event.No trends have been identified and erbe usa, inc.Is now closing the file on this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ERBE VIO 3
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse 17
tubingen, germany 72072
GM  72072
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse 17
tubingen, germany 72072
GM   72072
Manufacturer Contact
john tartal
2225 northwest parkway
marietta, GA 30067-8764
7709554400
MDR Report Key17754875
MDR Text Key323488945
Report Number9610614-2023-00049
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K190823
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/15/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberVIO 3
Device Catalogue Number10160-000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/29/2023
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/28/2023
Initial Date FDA Received09/15/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/08/2020
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age25 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight75 KG
-
-