The device history record (dhr) review confirms that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The device was returned and the lot number was confirmed with the packaging returned with the device.During visual inspection the guidewire was returned in two fragments (189.9cm proximal fragment and 9.5cm distal fragment).The guidewire was noted to be kinked bent at 60cm and 85.6cm.The guidewire ptfe coating was seen to be peeling in multiple areas from roughly 26.5cm.The proximal fragment was inspected, and the nitinol tubing was broken/fractured with the core wire exposed and broken.The distal fragment was inspected, and the nitinol tubing was seen to be broken/fractured with the core wire exposed and broken.The core wire distal end was observed through the distal tip dome.Functional inspection was unable to perform due to damage.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The reported event of guidewire kinked/bent was confirmed based on the analysis of the returned device.The reported event of the guidewire difficult to advance could not be confirmed/replicated due to the damaged device; however, the analysis results are consistent with the reported event.The device failed to meet specifications when received for complaint investigation based on the analyzed anomalies noted to the device.During visual inspection, the guidewire was noted to be kinked/bent at 60cm and 85.6cm from the proximal end and the guidewire was returned broken in 2 fragments (189.9cm proximal fragment and 9.5cm distal fragment).The nitinol tubing was broken/fractured with the core wire exposed and broken on both the proximal and distal fragments.The ptfe coating was noted to be peeling in multiple areas from roughly 26.5cm from the proximal end.Functional testing was unable to be performed due to the damage noted.Based on the analysis, it is probable that the guidewire experienced high tension and/or torsion forces while navigating inside the microcatheter to the aneurysm, and this caused the wire to kink and fracture.An assignable cause of procedural factors will be assigned to the reported and analyzed damage of the guidewire kinked/bent, the as reported event of the guidewire difficult to advance and the as analyzed damage of the guidewire distal tip broken/fractured during use since these issues are associated with a product that met stryker design and manufacturing specifications and was used in accordance with the dfu but performance was limited due to procedural and/or anatomical factors during use.The ptfe coating damage most likely occurred as a result of interaction with another device.The damage noted is consistent with insecure fastening of the torque device on the wire which can result in slippage and can cause abrasion/peeling of the ptfe layer.An assignable cause of handling damage will be assigned to the as analyzed damage of the guidewire ptfe coating peeling since this defect is associated with handling of the product or portion of the product during the clinical procedure, upon removal of the product from the packaging, or preparation of the product prior to use.
|