• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION EMBOLD FIBERED DETACHABLE COIL SYSTEM; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION EMBOLD FIBERED DETACHABLE COIL SYSTEM; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number 83910
Device Problems Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528); Stretched (1601); Difficult to Advance (2920); Material Protrusion/Extrusion (2979)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 08/20/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that there was an unretrieved device fragment.A 22x60 embold fibered coil was selected for use in the embolization of a splenic artery pseudoaneurysm.The anatomy was moderately tortuous.The coil was advanced through a 2.4fr non-boston scientific microcatheter.While positioning the coil into the pseudoaneurysm, there were quite a few turns, and the coil was not advancing smoothly and began buckling.The physician then tried to pull the coil back out, but it separated.Under fluoroscopy, a "long string of something, some kind of wire, fiber thing" was observed that went all the way down to the groin.The coil was snared, but while doing so, one whole piece broke off.Most of the device was retrieved, but there was still a piece that goes from the pseudoaneurysm through the splenic artery out into the celiac and about 5cm out into the abdominal aorta.The physician did not think this will cause an issue as it was not flow-limiting or causing any obstruction.Flow was still good.The radiopaque part of the coil was mostly in the splenic artery, and there's a less radiopaque part that is very thin and soft which hangs out into the celiac/aorta.Approximately 20-30cm was removed, but the last part was unable to be retrieved.The procedure was completed with a non-boston scientific coil.No further patient complications were reported, and the patient is expected to fully recover.
 
Event Description
It was reported that there was an unretrieved device fragment.A 22x60 embold fibered coil was selected for use in the embolization of a splenic artery pseudoaneurysm.The anatomy was moderately tortuous.The coil was advanced through a 2.4fr non-boston scientific microcatheter.While positioning the coil into the pseudoaneurysm, there were quite a few turns, and the coil was not advancing smoothly and began buckling.The physician then tried to pull the coil back out, but it separated.Under fluoroscopy, a "long string of something, some kind of wire, fiber thing" was observed that went all the way down to the groin.The coil was snared, but while doing so, one whole piece broke off.Most of the device was retrieved, but there was still a piece that goes from the pseudoaneurysm through the splenic artery out into the celiac and about 5cm out into the abdominal aorta.The physician did not think this will cause an issue as it was not flow-limiting or causing any obstruction.Flow was still good.The radiopaque part of the coil was mostly in the splenic artery, and there's a less radiopaque part that is very thin and soft which hangs out into the celiac/aorta.Approximately 20-30cm was removed, but the last part was unable to be retrieved.The procedure was completed with a non-boston scientific coil.No further patient complications were reported, and the patient is expected to fully recover.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device eval by manufacturer: the 22x60 embold fibered coil was returned for analysis.The delivery sheath, delivery wire, and a severely damaged, stretched, and tangled coil were returned.Visual and microscopic analysis was conducted.The perforations were intact.The delivery wire was inside of the delivery sheath.The distal and proximal couplers were attached to the delivery wire via the pull wire.No damage on the delivery sheath or delivery wire was noticed.The couplers showed slight bends.The coil was severely stretched and tangled, and there were multiple breaks on the coil wire.The stretched coil was not connected to the distal coupler.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage, revealed no other damage or irregularities.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EMBOLD FIBERED DETACHABLE COIL SYSTEM
Type of Device
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
model farm road
cork T12 Y K88
EI   T12 YK88
Manufacturer Contact
rachel shields
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
6512422111
MDR Report Key17769516
MDR Text Key323685074
Report Number2124215-2023-50133
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier08714729983743
UDI-Public08714729983743
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/11/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number83910
Device Catalogue Number83910
Device Lot Number0030761580
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/13/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/21/2023
Initial Date FDA Received09/18/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/21/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/11/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/23/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
MICROCATHETER: 2.4FR PROGREAT; MICROCATHETER: 2.4FR PROGREAT
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age36 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-