• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: UNKNOWN ROTAREX; THROMBECTOMY & ATHERECTOMY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

UNKNOWN ROTAREX; THROMBECTOMY & ATHERECTOMY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 80237
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Perforation of Vessels (2135)
Event Date 02/23/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H10: nicolas w.Shammas, james t.Torey, and w.John shammas (2018).Dissections in peripheral vascular interventions: a proposed classification using intravascular ultrasound.Journal of invasive cardiology, 30(4): 145-146.H10: d4 (expiration date: 07/2023).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event Description
It was reported in an article in the journal of ¿invasive cardiology¿ titled ¿dissections in peripheral vascular interventions: a proposed classification using intravascular ultrasound", that after one run of device in the occluded distal popliteal artery, the patient allegedly complained of pain.It was further reported that the angiogram revealed, the patient allegedly had vessel perforation of one centimeter above the original lesion.Furthermore, the patient underwent additional medical intervention for covered stent placement with post dilatation.Reportedly, the patient was recovered with less than ten percent residual narrowing.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Event Description
It was reported in an article in the journal of ¿invasive cardiology¿ titled ¿dissections in peripheral vascular interventions: a proposed classification using intravascular ultrasound", that after one run of device in the occluded distal popliteal artery, the patient allegedly complained of pain.It was further reported that the angiogram revealed, the patient allegedly experienced vessel perforation of one centimeter above the original lesion.Furthermore, the patient underwent additional medical intervention for covered stent placement with post dilatation.Reportedly, the patient was recovered with less than ten percent residual narrowing.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing-related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical sample was not received for evaluation and a physical investigation was not possible.The user report contains information regarding the adverse event without identified device or use problem.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported failure.A clear root cause could not be identified but a blockage of the catheter represents a known inherent risk.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: nicolas w.Shammas, james t.Torey, and w.John shammas (2018).Dissections in peripheral vascular interventions: a proposed classification using intravascular ultrasound.Journal of invasive cardiology, 30(4): 145-146.H10: d4 (expiration date: 07/2023), g3, h6 (method) h11: b3 h11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROTAREX
Type of Device
THROMBECTOMY & ATHERECTOMY
Manufacturer (Section D)
UNKNOWN
BR 
Manufacturer (Section G)
UNKNOWN
BR  
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key17770882
MDR Text Key323682797
Report Number3008439199-2023-00148
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K211738
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/02/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/19/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number80237
Device Lot Number201041
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/07/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age89 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-