|
Catalog Number 03.043.029 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problems
Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: d2: additional procode: hwc.D9: complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.E3: reporter is a synthes employee.H3, h6: the investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from the united kingdom reports an event as follows: it was reported that on an unknown date, an aiming arm was received with a broken attachment clip.It is unknown how the breakage occurred.This report is for an aiming arm/ radiolucent.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h4, h6: the photo was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned photo.The photo investigation revealed that the aim-arm radioluc [03.043.029/2024223] had both of the hooks of the latch broken, fragments were not returned.No other issues were found.The device has signs of normal use/wear and no evidence of hammer marks were observed on the provided evidence, therefore, a potential cause cannot be established with the provided information due to be a multifactorial issue.The semi-extended parapatellar approach surgical technique guide was reviewed.The following relevant statements were found.Precautions: -ensure that the connection between the nail and the insertion handle is tight.Retighten if necessary, after hammering and prior to the attachment of the aiming arm.-do not attach the aiming arm to the insertion handle at this point.Do not exert forces on the aiming arm.These forces may prevent breakage of the device.Based on the investigation findings, the primary cause was related to the users hammering with the aiming arm in place or actually hitting on the aiming arm.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed, and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.The overall complaint was confirmed for aim-arm radioluc [03.043.029/2024223].There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Device history review (dhr): part: 03.043.029 lot: 2024223 release to warehouse date: 16 mar 2021 manufacturing site: werk selzach expiration date: n.A supplier: (b)(4).A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished article lot and no non-conformances were identified.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H3, h6: a product investigation was conducted.The product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.The depuy synthes team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the aim-arm radioluc had both of the hooks of the latch broken, fragments were not returned.The device has signs of normal use/wear and no evidence of hammer marks were observed, therefore, a potential cause cannot be established with the provided information due to be a multifactorial issue.The semi-extended parapatellar approach surgical technique guide se_814687 ad was reviewed.Following relevant statements were found.Precautions: ensure that the connection between the nail and the insertion handle is tight.Retighten if necessary, after hammering and prior to the attachment of the aiming arm.Do not attach the aiming arm to the insertion handle at this point.Do not exert forces on the aiming arm.These forces may prevent breakage of the device.A dimensional inspection for the aim-arm radioluc was not performed due to post manufacturing damage.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the aim-arm radioluc would contribute to the complained device issue and hence the root cause cannot be determined.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|