Additional data: b5, h3, h6, h10 device evaluation: an initial visual inspection of the returned device revealed some scoring on the distraction rod, but no deep cuts were observed.The housing tube appeared to have some rust coloring.A review of the provided photo images visually confirmed the blackening of the tissue.There was no ¿pistoning¿ observed prior to functional testing.A functional test was attempted and confirmed the reported failure to distract.During testing the device did not move with either the fast distractor, distraction test fixture or external remote controller (erc).The in-house device x-ray revealed that the bearing broke in two pieces.The rod was sectioned on the lathe and the internal components were inspected.Titanium (ti) debris was discovered on multiple components.The bearing was also visually confirmed to be broken with titanium debris covering the magnet.It is likely that the bearing was bound up by the titanium debris.This debris increased the friction inside of the bearing and some axial loading that likely generated the debris contributed to the bearing breaking.The axial loading was likely related to patient-related factors.Device record review: a review of the device history record (dhr) indicates the device was manufactured by the specified requirement at the time and met all of the required inspections before shipment.
|