• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS - HOUSTON LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS - HOUSTON LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Neck Pain (2433); Shock from Patient Lead(s) (3162); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Date 12/01/2008
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
F10 health effect, clinical code: code e2402 utilized; appropriate term ¿protrusion¿ is not available.- protrusion to capture incidents of a device being visible under the skin.Livanova usa, inc.Submits this report to comply with 21 c.F.R.Part 803, the medical device reporting regulation, based on information that livanova has obtained, but may not have been able to investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.This report does not constitute an admission, or a conclusion by fda or anyone else, that the device, livanova, or livanova's employees caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any "defects¿ or "malfunctions¿.These words are incorporated into the fda 3500a medwatch form by the fda, and livanova objects to their use.
 
Event Description
It was reported by the patient that they began experiencing the neck bulge at the electrode site during magnet stimulation following a recent fall.During explant surgery which previously was not indicated to be intervention for the adverse events, it was found that the electrodes were not attached to the nerve and was improperly implanted therefore was possibly stimulating to an unintended site.Training has already been provided to the implanting surgeon.Lead was received and product analysis was completed in mfr report # 1644487-2008-01149.Product analysis for the returned lead was completed.Note that a large portion of the lead assemble including the electrodes was not returned for analysis.Continuity checks of the returned lead portion were performed, during visual analysis no other discontinuities were identified.Patient later reported that the device was explanted due to the experienced severe pain alongside their neck bulging during magnet stimulation.It is concluded this intervention was also due to the protrusion.This surgery was not previously reported to be due to the adverse events.No other relevant information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS - HOUSTON
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS - HOUSTON
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
dana sprague
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2816672681
MDR Report Key17783025
MDR Text Key323859265
Report Number1644487-2023-01361
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/20/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date01/31/2009
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number1509
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/16/2009
Event Location Other
Date Manufacturer Received08/26/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/04/2006
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age26 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-