• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ORGANON & CO. JADA SYSTEM; INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ORGANON & CO. JADA SYSTEM; INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 09/18/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information we have received, there is no indication that the device malfunctioned.The device is assembled according to specifications.In process and finished product testing are performed and approved prior to release.
 
Event Description
A clot had formed in the tube that extends from the loop to the vacuum tubing.It was in the tube before the vacuum connector [device occlusion].Case narrative: this spontaneous report originating from the united states was received from a nurse via clinical account specialist (cas) and designated point of contact (dpoc), referring to a female patient of an unknown age.The patient's current condition included hospitalization.Her historical conditions, past drugs/ allergies and concomitant medications were not reported.This report concerns 1 patient and 1 device.On (b)(6) 2023, the patient was placed with vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) via an unknown route for an unknown indication.It was reported that upon taking the patient from the operating room (o.R.) to the post-anesthesia care unit (pacu), the vacuum was unplugged and then re-attached to the vacuum system in the pacu.A clot had formed in the tube that extended from the loop to the vacuum tubing.It was in the tube before the vacuum connector (device occlusion, onset date: (b)(6) 2023).The reporter asked what was supposed to be done in this instance, and asked if the device should be replaced.It was also reported that the reporter could not flush it and it was not clearing with the vacuum attached, even with higher pressure on the vacuum.Reportedly, at the time of reporting the patient was in the intensive care unit (icu) (considered as prolonged hospitalization).It was unknown if the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was available for evaluation.For vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system), lot number and serial number were not provided.When the lot number is unknown, a technical investigation of the specific manufacturing process which includes review of records associated with a known lot number cannot be performed.Therefore, priority quality investigation will not be completed.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.Fda code: (health effects - health impact per annex f): 4608 patient requires admission to or extension of stay in an intensive care unit.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
JADA SYSTEM
Type of Device
INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ORGANON & CO.
30 hudson street
jersey city NJ 07302
Manufacturer (Section G)
ORGANON & CO.
30 hudson street
jersey city NJ 07302
Manufacturer Contact
30 hudson street
jersey city, NJ 07302
MDR Report Key17787675
MDR Text Key323908059
Report Number3002806821-2023-00110
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OQY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
510K K201199
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/21/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/21/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient SexFemale
-
-