Jada was placed but blood was "rapidly collecting in the (suction) canister, approximately 500ml and with more blood rapidly collecting -device ineffective.Case narrative: this spontaneous report originating from the united states was received from a nurse via clinical account specialist (cas), referring to a female patient of an unknown age.The patient's historical conditions included pregnancy and delivery.Her current condition included hospitalization.Her past drugs/ allergies and concomitant medications were not reported.This report concerns 1 patient and 1 device.On an unknown date, the patient was in the operating room for postpartum hemorrhage and vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was placed via intrauterine route by an unspecified provider, however, blood was rapidly collecting in the (suction) canister, approximately 500 ml and with more blood rapidly collecting (device ineffective).The provider decided to move on to alternative interventions (further unspecified) to control the bleeding.The vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was removed, and bleeding was controlled after bakri was placed.No further information was provided.It was unknown if the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was available for evaluation.For vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system), lot number and serial number were not provided.Upon internal review, the event of device ineffective was considered to be serious due to required intervention.When the lot number is unknown, a technical investigation of the specific manufacturing process which includes review of records associated with a known lot number cannot be performed.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.Fda code: (health effects - health impact per annex f): 4642 additional device required (use of an additional or alternative device require to achieve optimal outcome.).
|