Estimated blood loss (ebl) was reported as 3 liters and reporting nurse states the provider is considering it a jada failure [device ineffective].Case narrative: this spontaneous report originating from united states was received from a nurse via clinical sales educator (cse), referring to a 21-year-old adult female patient.It was reported that the patient had no past medical history and no pertinent medical history.The patient's concomitant medications, and drug reactions/allergies were not reported.The patient's medical history and concurrent condition included: on an unknown date approximately in (b)(6) 2022, the patient became pregnant (reported as full-term pregnancy).In (b)(6) 2023, the patient was hospitalized for the delivery and gave birth to her first baby (full-term) via vaginal delivery on (b)(6) 2023.It was reported that the patient started bleeding after delivery with no uterotonic medications administered initially.This report concerned 1 patient and 1 device.On (b)(6) 2023, the patient had second vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) placement via intrauterine route (lot# and expiration date were not reported) for post-partum hemorrhage.Uterotonic medications (unspecified) were given (reported as exact medications were unknown).The patient was later taken to the operating room and was put under (unspecified), and no hysterectomy was performed.On an unknown date in (b)(6) 2023, the patient had interventional radiology (ir) for an unknown intervention.After interventional radiology (ir) (no results provided), the patient was later taken to the intensive care unit (icu).It was reported that the estimated blood loss (ebl) was 3 liters and the provider considered it a vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) failure (device ineffective).For vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system), the lot number and the serial number were not available.Clinical sales educator had not spoken with the provider directly and stated that it was unknown if the hemorrhage was due to atony or any other source of bleeding.No additional adverse event (ae)/ product quality complaint (pqc) reported.No further information provided.Upon internal review, the event of device ineffective was considered to be medically significant.This case is one of two reports derived for the same patient.When the lot number is unknown, a technical investigation of the specific manufacturing process which includes review of records associated with a known lot number cannot be performed.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.Fda code: (health effects - health impact per annex f): 4624 surgical intervention (one or more surgical procedures was required, or an existing procedure changed.).
|