• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NELLCOR PURITAN BENNETT MEXICO SA NELLCOR; OXIMETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NELLCOR PURITAN BENNETT MEXICO SA NELLCOR; OXIMETER Back to Search Results
Model Number MAX-I-I
Device Problem Low Readings (2460)
Patient Problem Low Oxygen Saturation (2477)
Event Date 07/14/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
D10 concomitant product: max-i-i max inf o2 sensor i20 3-20 kg (lot# 231700140h) medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, the sensor had low spo2 reading that could be seen on different monitors.It was checked with two different saturation simulators which resulted that as lower the saturation was set, a higher was the deviation downwards.Due to the incorrect readings (a high downward deviation), an unnecessary bga was performed and the sensor was change.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: h3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.The evaluation found no potentially contributing factors, and the sample met all related specifications.It was reported that the monitor provided lower oximetry readings than expected.The reported issue could not be confirmed.The most likely cause could not be identified because no related problem was detected with the device.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, the sensor had low spo2 reading that could be seen on different monitors.It was checked with two different saturation simulators which resulted that as lower the saturation was set, a higher was the deviation downwards.Due to the incorrect readings (a high downward deviation), an unnecessary bga was performed and the sensor was change.It was reported that, due to the spo2 values seem to be very low the hcp checked this in relation to other vital signs, which all were okay.Due to these events occurred on a nicu/picu we were not able to check this again at a patient, so we used a simulator as already described.They used new sensors for investigation and the issue occurred also.Sensor placed at the patients foot and the baseline were the values when incident occurred was between 7-20% (depends on the level of saturation).Spo2 under alarm limit and was in silent mode.During surveillance of the patient; during testing with simulator, no bga data available due to data restrictions, no exact patient number.A new sensor was used and changing to a new sensor was mostly effective.There was no harm just because ot the professionalism of the hcp (spo2 readings did not match the other vital signs.
 
Event Description
According to the reporter, the sensor had low spo2 reading that could be seen on different monitors.The first sensor was placed at the patient's foot and the baseline values were between 7-20% (depends on the level of saturation).Spo2 was under alarm limit and was in silent mode.Due to the incorrect readings (a high downward deviation), an unnecessary arterial blood gas (abg) was performed.The second sensor was used for investigation but the issue also occurred.It was checked with two different saturation simulators which resulted that as lower the saturation was set, a higher was the deviation downwards.Third sensor was used and it worked effectively.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: b5, d9, g3, h3, h6 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NELLCOR
Type of Device
OXIMETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
NELLCOR PURITAN BENNETT MEXICO SA
boulevard insurgentes 19030
tijuana 22225
MX  22225
Manufacturer (Section G)
NELLCOR PURITAN BENNETT MEXICO SA
boulevard insurgentes 19030
tijuana 22225
MX   22225
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key17800143
MDR Text Key324056182
Report Number1282497-2023-00046
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DQA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K012891
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 12/27/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/22/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMAX-I-I
Device Catalogue NumberMAX-I-I
Device Lot Number220170148H
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/29/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/17/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
SEE NOTES ON H10.
-
-