• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INTUITY ELITE VALVE SYSTEM; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INTUITY ELITE VALVE SYSTEM; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 8300AB
Device Problems Perivalvular Leak (1457); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Edwards received a notification that a valve model 8300ab27 implanted in the aortic position was explanted after an implant duration of four (5) years and six (6) months due to paravalvular leak (pvl).Pledgets were not used.At time of initial implant, pvl was not apparent.The valve was successfully replaced with a 11500a25 valve.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3.Device evaluation: customer report of paravalvular leakage (pvl) was unable to be confirmed through visual observations.As received, the frame of the valve was deformed and pushed inward around commisure 1.X-ray demonstrated commisure 1 and 3 bent outwards and frame expanded.X-ray demonstrated minimal calcification on all three leaflets.Host tissue was moderate at the frame inflow.H10.Additional manufacturer narrative: the investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device history record (dhr) was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
Edwards received a notification that a valve model 8300ab27 implanted in the aortic position was explanted after an implant duration of four (4) years and six (6) months due to paravalvular leak (pvl).Pledgets were not used.At time of initial implant, pvl was not apparent.The valve was successfully replaced with a 11500a25 valve.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data b5 (describe event or problem) added information to section h6 (type of investigation), h6 (investigation findings) and h6 (investigations conclusions) h10: additional manufacturer narrative: regurgitation is considered to be a perivalvular leak (pvl) if a turbulent eccentric jet originates between the bioprosthetic sewing ring and the annulus.Pvl can occur in the mitral and aortic position for similar reasons.In the early postoperative period, the highest incidence of pvl has been seen in patients developing infective endocarditis, which is most likely attributed to inadequate peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis or nosocomial infection.Annular calcification is also a risk factor for the development of peri-operative pvl as the bioprosthesis may not seat properly after debridement.Technique related factors, such as incorrect valve sizing, have been shown to contribute to the development of pvl.Anatomical factors may create difficulty seating the bioprosthetic valve resulting in pvl.The anatomy of the annulus may induce mechanical stresses along the rigid bioprosthetic ring which can influence long-term valve performance and durability.A diseased or rigid annulus can potentially increase the mechanical stress on the prosthetic valve, leading to pvl.A definitive root cause cannot be conclusively determined; however, patient factors likely caused or contributed.Pannus overgrowth, or host tissue, is considered to be a form of non-structural valve dysfunction.The growth of host tissue on the sewing ring is expected and is a natural part of the healing reaction to prosthesis implantation.A small amount of host tissue growth over the suture line is needed to form a non-thrombogenic surface and complete the healing process after valve implantation.In contrast, if there is an excessive amount of pannus growth, it can extend onto the cusp surfaces leading to thickening of the cusps, leaflet immobility, elevated gradients, and stenosis.Host tissue growth can also contribute to cusp retraction or curling resulting in valvular regurgitation.Host fibrous (pannus) tissue growth is not a malfunction of the device.The most likely cause is patient factors.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS INTUITY ELITE VALVE SYSTEM
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key17818167
MDR Text Key324266883
Report Number2015691-2023-16176
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150036
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/28/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/26/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/03/2022
Device Model Number8300AB
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/19/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/21/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/04/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age61 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-