See d4 expiration date and h4 the agent reported that (implant opened incorrectly due to similarity of packing to the small shell version) this event occurred during surgery, away from the patient.No risk or adverse event was reported by the surgeon.The surgery was completed as intended, with a thirty-minute delay.The implant was inspected prior to use and was deemed unacceptable for use based on its appearance.The agent was present during surgery and was able to source a suitable replacement device.Rma evaluation: the implant was not returned to djo for further examination, the implant has been marked as lost or discarded.If the implant were to be returned to djo surgical an amendment will be opened to gather additional information.A review of 509-00-032 device history record (dhr) revealed the implant, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no ncmrs associated with the production of this implant.Complaint database review showed one previous complaint but there were no indications that this implant has a design or material deficiency.The root cause of this complaint is difficult to determine since the device was not returned for evaluation.According to the description though, the implant was opened incorrectly, and it is probable that the procedure was not followed on how the implant was handled.This is not an event associated with a product failure, malfunction, or issue.
|