• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS LUCERA ELITE GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD. EVIS LUCERA ELITE GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number GIF-XP290N
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Perforation (2001); Pancreatitis (4481)
Event Date 03/01/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The literature article is attached for additional information.The investigation is ongoing.A supplemental report will be submitted upon completion of the investigation or when additional information becomes available.
 
Event Description
Olympus medical systems corp.(omsc) received a literature titled "comparing endoscopic ultrasound-guided antegrade treatment and balloon endoscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of bile duct stones in patients with surgically altered anatomy: a retrospective cohort study".Endoscopic ultrasound-guided antegrade treatment (eus-ag) and balloon endoscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (be-ercp) have emerged as useful procedures for managing bile duct stones (bds) in patients with surgically altered anatomy.However, the comparison between these two procedures has not been well studied.The aim of our study was to compare the clinical outcomes of eus-ag and beercp for managing bds in patients with surgically altered anatomy.Type of adverse events/number of patients: event1: bile peritonitis(n=3).Event2: elevation of c-reactive protein (n=1).Event3: pancreatitis (n=3).Event4: perforation (n=4).The following procedure and olympus devices are used in this literature.(1) eus-ag convex-type eus scope (gf-uct260) fine-needle aspiration (fna) needle (ez shot 3 plus : estimated as na-u200h-8019) retrieval balloon catheter (multi-3 v plus : estimated as b-v232p-b) ercp scope (tjf 260 or tjf 290) mechanical lithotripsy (ml: lithocrushv : estimated as bml-v437qr-30).(2) be-ercp 0.025-inch guidewire (visiglide 2) extraction balloon (multi-3 v plus) lithocrushv ultra-slim endoscope (gif-xp260n or gif-xp290n).The following events have been reported in the literature (refer to table 3 of the literature): event1: bile peritonitis(n=3) : occurred in eus-ag.Event2: elevation of c-reactive protein as others (n=1) : occurred in eus-ag.Event3: pancreatitis (n=3) : occurred in be-ercp.Event4: perforation (n=4) : occurred in be-ercp.Three patients with perforation after be-ercp experienced severe adverse events, necessitating surgery in one and clip closure in two.A moderate case occurred in one patient with bile peritonitis after eus-ag who required an additional procedure using be-ercp to place an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage.This event requires eight reports with patient identifiers: - devices used for eus-ag and be-ercp: (1) (b)(6) b-v232p-b (event 1,2,3,4).(2) (b)(6) bml-v437qr-30 (event 1,2,3,4).- devices used for eus-ag: (3) (b)(6) gf-uct260 (event 1,2).(4) (b)(6) na-u200h-8019 (event 1,2).(5) (b)(6) tjf-260v (event 1,2).(6) (b)(6) tjf-q290v (event 1,2).- devices used for be-ercp (7) (b)(6) gif-xp260n (event 3,4).(8) (b)(6) gif-xp290n (event 3,4).This report is for (b)(6).
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the author confirms this event was not caused by an olympus device and there is no malfunction in olympus device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation and to provide additional information received from the author.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the serial and/or lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse events cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.In addition, based on the clinical/medical evaluation and risk assessment, it is possible that the reported event is an accident, or a complication associated with a procedure using the subject device.Therefore, the root cause cannot be determined.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVIS LUCERA ELITE GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
GASTROINTESTINAL VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima 965-8 520
JA  965-8520
Manufacturer (Section G)
AIZU OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
3-1-1 niiderakita
aizuwakamatsu-shi, fukushima
Manufacturer Contact
todd brill
800 west park drive
westborough, MA 01581
5082077661
MDR Report Key17878202
MDR Text Key325011736
Report Number9610595-2023-14662
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FDS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Study,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/03/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/05/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberGIF-XP290N
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/30/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-