• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION VIGILANT X4 CRT-D; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION VIGILANT X4 CRT-D; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number G247
Device Problems Pacing Problem (1439); Inaccurate Synchronization (1609)
Patient Problem Arrhythmia (1721)
Event Date 09/15/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient with this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) was experiencing what appears as a tachycardia wide complex paced rhythm.The physician was made aware that presenting rhythm shows more atrial beats than ventricular (v), and it appears that patient is in a slow ventricular tachycardia (vt) that is being bi-v trigger paced because the rate is around 110.Pt has treatment of atp for 130bpm and above.Turning down pace rate to see what rhythm the patient is doing was recommended.No stored events because rates were lower than 130bpm.The crt-d remains in service at this time and there was no asystole nor patient symptoms.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient with this cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (crt-d) was experiencing what appears as a tachycardia wide complex paced rhythm.The physician was made aware that presenting rhythm shows more atrial beats than ventricular (v), and it appears that patient is in a slow ventricular tachycardia (vt) that is being bi-v trigger paced because the rate is around 110.Pt has treatment of atp for 130bpm and above.Turning down pace rate to see what rhythm the patient is doing was recommended.No stored events because rates were lower than 130bpm.The crt-d remains in service at this time and there was no asystole nor patient symptoms.Additional information was received from medical safety team mentioning it seems patient is in a slow wide complex rhythm that may not even be vt, atrium beats >ventricular beats per complaint, where the device is trigger pacing, does not read as though the trigger pacing induced the rhythm even if it is vt.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VIGILANT X4 CRT-D
Type of Device
CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY DEFIBRILLATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key17892888
MDR Text Key325235367
Report Number2124215-2023-55511
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIK
UDI-Device Identifier00802526589287
UDI-Public00802526589287
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/09/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberG247
Device Catalogue NumberG247
Device Lot Number287672
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/17/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/05/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-