• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC ULTRAFLEX IAB: 7.5FR 40CC; SYSTEM, BALLOON, INTRA-AORTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC ULTRAFLEX IAB: 7.5FR 40CC; SYSTEM, BALLOON, INTRA-AORTIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IAB-06840-U
Device Problem Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/16/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent iabp implantation due to emergency arrhythmia, arrhythmia electrical storm, and respiratory and cardiac arrest.The catheterization was completed at 23:30 on (b)(6) 2023, the iabp worked normally before being sent to the icu.At 06:58 on (b)(6) 2023, the iabp suddenly stopped working.The catheter was removed and the doctor found it was difficult to remove, considering the risk, the doctor contacted interventional vascular surgery for consultation to remove the balloon.After undergoing femoral artery opening surgery, the balloon was successfully removed, and the patient returned to the icu in good condition.Another iab was not inserted.No patient harm or injury.The patient status is reported as "fine".At the time of this report the customer has not returned our requests for additional information.If additional information is received, the complaint file will be updated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Other remarks: n/a.Corrected data: n/a.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The additional information received on 17oct2023 reported that anticoagulants were administered prior to the procedure.The procedure was a single successful attempt and the iab catheter ruptured when it was surgically removed.The patient condition was fine post-surgery.The reported complaint for iab blood in helium pathway was confirmed based upon the investigation of the returned sample.The customer returned a 40cc 7.5fr ultraflex intra-aortic balloon catheter (iabc) without the original packaging for investigation.The sample was returned in a brown cardboard box within a yellow bio-hazard bag (inp-1, inp-2).Upon return, the distal end of the teflon sheath was at approximately 44.4cm from the iabc distal tip (inp-4).The teflon sheath was noted connected to the hemostasis cuff (inp-4, inp-5).A non-teleflex 60 ml syringe was inserted to the one-way valve; blood was noted within the syringe (inp-5).The one-way valve was tethered and connected to the short driveline tubing (inp-5).The supplied arterial pressure tubing was connected to the iabc luer; clear fluid was noted within the tubing (inp-5).The iabc bladder was fully unwrapped (inp-6).The iabc central lumen was noted broken within the flex-tip assembly area at approximately 6cm from the iabc distal tip (inp-7).Bends to the iabc central lumen were noted at approximately 16cm, 41.8cm, and 68.4cm from the iabc distal tip (inp-6, inp-8, inp-9).Dried blood was noted on the exterior surfaces of the returned sample.Dried blood was noted within the bladder/helium pathway.The bladder thickness was measured at six points with measurements ranging from 0.0058in-0.0064in and was within specification of process document.The one-way valve was tested and failed.A vacuum was pulled on the one-way valve, and it immediately lost pressure.This was repeated five separate times according to quality system document with similar results.Dried blood was noted within the one-way valve upon cleaning.The one-way valve was properly cleaned and tested again; the one-way valve passed.A vacuum was pulled on the one-way valve, and it held for at least 1 minute and then 30 seconds five separate times in accordance with quality system document.An attempt to aspirate and flush the iabc central lumen using a 60cc lab-inventory syringe was unable to be successfully completed.Upon aspiration, water was unable to be consistently pulled into the syringe.The attempt to flush resulted in bladder inflation.The results are consistent with the previously noted damaged central lumen (inp-7).The iabc was leak tested in accordance with testing methods from manufactu ring procedure.Three leaks were immediately noticeable from the bladder membrane (anp-1).Under microscopic inspection, the leak sites are consistent with contact from a sharp object and were noted at approximately 24.6cm, 24.7cm and 25.6cm from the iabc distal tip (anp-2, anp-3, anp-4).Based on the event details, the leak sites consistent with contact from a sharp object likely occurred after removal of the device and the broken central lumen in the flex tip assembly was the most likely cause of the blood in the helium pathway.A lab inventory 0.025in guidewire was back loaded through the iabc distal tip.The guidewire met resistance and could not advance at approximately 3.9cm from the iabc distal tip due to a blocked central lumen.Some blood was noted on the guidewire.The central lumen was likely blocked by dried blood.The guidewire was front loaded through the iabc luer.The guidewire met resistance and could not advance at approximately 40.2cm from the iabc luer due to a blocked central lumen.Some blood was noted on the guidewire.The central lumen was likely blocked by dried blood.Based on a review of the device history record (dhr), the product met specification upon release; however, the specifications were not met during the complaint investigation due to the broken central lumen.The root cause of the complaint was undetermined.Further investigation has been initiated under teleflex's quality system by the manufacturing site to further investigate this issue.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend on complaints of this nature.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent iabp implantation due to emergency arrhythmia, arrhythmia electrical storm, and respiratory and cardiac arrest.The catheterization was completed at 23:30 on (b)(6) 2023, the iabp worked normally before being sent to the icu.At 06:58 on (b)(6) 2023, the iabp suddenly stopped working.The catheter was removed and the doctor found it was difficult to remove, considering the risk, the doctor contacted interventional vascular surgery for consultation to remove the balloon.After undergoing femoral artery opening surgery, the balloon was successfully removed, and the patient returned to the icu in good condition.Another iab was not inserted.No patient harm or injury.The patient status is reported as "fine".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ULTRAFLEX IAB: 7.5FR 40CC
Type of Device
SYSTEM, BALLOON, INTRA-AORTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL LLC
morrisville NC
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARROW INTERNATIONAL INC.
16 elizabeth drive
chelmsford MA 01824
Manufacturer Contact
kevin don bosco
3015 carrington mill blvd
morrisville 27560
MDR Report Key17924407
MDR Text Key325529691
Report Number3010532612-2023-00584
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSP
UDI-Device Identifier00801902026804
UDI-Public00801902026804
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K000729
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/25/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberIAB-06840-U
Device Lot Number18F23E0052
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/25/2023
Initial Date FDA Received10/12/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/14/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/15/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/26/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
N/A.; N/A.
Patient Age49 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-