BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INTERLOCK-35; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 83787 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528); Stretched (1601); Failure to Advance (2524); Separation Failure (2547)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 09/18/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the interlocking arm was fractured.The 7.8mm, moderately tortuous target lesion was located in the splenic artery.A 10mm x 40cm.035 interlock coil was selected for use.During the procedure, after hepatic artery embolization, the device was advanced to splenic artery.It was noted that due to high blood flow, the coil could not be anchored.After repeated attempts, it could neither be pushed nor pulled back.After the entire non boston scientific imaging catheter and interlock were removed, it was found that the coil had been stretched and the interlocking arms were fractured.The procedure was completed with a different coil size.There were no patient complications reported and the patient status was stable post procedure.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the interlocking arm was fractured.The 7.8mm, moderately tortuous target lesion was located in the splenic artery.A 10mm x 40cm.035 interlock coil was selected for use.During the procedure, after hepatic artery embolization, the device was advanced to splenic artery.It was noted that due to high blood flow, the coil could not be anchored.After repeated attempts, it could neither be pushed nor pulled back.After the entire non boston scientific imaging catheter and interlock were removed, it was found that the coil had been stretched and the interlocking arms were fractured.The procedure was completed with a different coil size.There were no patient complications reported and the patient status was stable post procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr.: the device was returned for analysis.The main coil, the pusher wire, and the introducer sheath were returned for the analysis.It was observed the main coil was stretched, detached, and bent at the coil arm section.Functional testing could not be performed due to the main coil and the pusher wire not interlocking.Dimensional inspection revealed that the zap tip and primary coil outer diameters were within specification.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|