• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INTERLOCK-35; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INTERLOCK-35; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number 83787
Device Problems Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528); Stretched (1601); Failure to Advance (2524); Separation Failure (2547)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/18/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the interlocking arm was fractured.The 7.8mm, moderately tortuous target lesion was located in the splenic artery.A 10mm x 40cm.035 interlock coil was selected for use.During the procedure, after hepatic artery embolization, the device was advanced to splenic artery.It was noted that due to high blood flow, the coil could not be anchored.After repeated attempts, it could neither be pushed nor pulled back.After the entire non boston scientific imaging catheter and interlock were removed, it was found that the coil had been stretched and the interlocking arms were fractured.The procedure was completed with a different coil size.There were no patient complications reported and the patient status was stable post procedure.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the interlocking arm was fractured.The 7.8mm, moderately tortuous target lesion was located in the splenic artery.A 10mm x 40cm.035 interlock coil was selected for use.During the procedure, after hepatic artery embolization, the device was advanced to splenic artery.It was noted that due to high blood flow, the coil could not be anchored.After repeated attempts, it could neither be pushed nor pulled back.After the entire non boston scientific imaging catheter and interlock were removed, it was found that the coil had been stretched and the interlocking arms were fractured.The procedure was completed with a different coil size.There were no patient complications reported and the patient status was stable post procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr.: the device was returned for analysis.The main coil, the pusher wire, and the introducer sheath were returned for the analysis.It was observed the main coil was stretched, detached, and bent at the coil arm section.Functional testing could not be performed due to the main coil and the pusher wire not interlocking.Dimensional inspection revealed that the zap tip and primary coil outer diameters were within specification.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERLOCK-35
Type of Device
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
300 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORK LIMITED
model farm road
cork T12 Y K88
EI   T12 YK88
Manufacturer Contact
rachel shields
4100 hamline ave n
arden hills, MN 55112
6512422111
MDR Report Key17931877
MDR Text Key325863741
Report Number2124215-2023-51877
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier08714729795513
UDI-Public08714729795513
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K133208
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/13/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number83787
Device Catalogue Number83787
Device Lot Number0031626173
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/19/2023
Initial Date FDA Received10/13/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/20/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/13/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/16/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age48 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight48 KG
-
-