• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 11500A
Device Problem Perivalvular Leak (1457)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/13/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
It was learned through implant patient registry and investigation that a patient with a 27mm 11500a aortic valve was explanted at implant due to regurgitant jet/pvl through the valve.The explanted valve was replaced with a 25mm 11500a valve.Per medical records, the patient underwent an avr.Intraoperatively there was native aortic valve and annular calcifications which was debrided, the large annulus was sized to 27mm.A 27mm 11500a was implanted with total of 14 sutures, valve was seated and secured with cor-knots.The patient was weaned from bypass and cannulas removed.Tee showed regurgitant jet through the valve that was at least mild-moderate and eccentric.Decision was made to evaluate the valve and the patient was recannulated.The valve was found to have no obvious defect, however there was an area under the right cusp where a shaft of calcium was not well seated and possible source of perivalvular leak.The valve was replaced with a 25mm 11500a.Post tee showed good valve function with no regurgitation and gradient of 8mmhg.The patient was transferred in critical, but stable condition to the icu.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional customer complaint.The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated sections: d4 expiration date, g3, g6, h4, h6 component code, type of investigation, investigation findings, and investigation conclusions.The device history record was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Regurgitation is considered to be a perivalvular leak (pvl) if a turbulent eccentric jet originates between the bioprosthetic sewing ring and the annulus.Pvl can occur in the mitral and aortic position for similar reasons.In the early postoperative period, the highest incidence of pvl has been seen in patients developing infective endocarditis, which is most likely attributed to inadequate peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis or nosocomial infection.Annular calcification is also a risk factor for the development of peri-operative pvl as the bioprosthesis may not seat properly after debridement.Technique related factors, such as incorrect valve sizing, have been shown to contribute to the development of pvl.Anatomical factors may create difficulty seating the bioprosthetic valve resulting in pvl.The anatomy of the annulus may induce mechanical stresses along the rigid bioprosthetic ring which can influence long-term valve performance and durability.A diseased or rigid annulus can potentially increase the mechanical stress on the prosthetic valve, leading to pvl.A definitive root cause cannot be conclusively determined; however, patient and/or procedural factors likely caused or contributed to the event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key17935134
MDR Text Key325678416
Report Number2015691-2023-16819
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
UDI-Device Identifier00690103195002
UDI-Public(01)00690103195002(17)250610(11)210611217702617
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150048
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/13/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number11500A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/30/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/11/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Life Threatening; Hospitalization;
Patient Age64 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-