Catalog Number 80202 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Retraction Problem (1536); Failure to Advance (2524); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 09/20/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex products are identified in d2 and g4.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The return of the sample is pending.However, a photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 05/2026).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device pending return.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure, the catheter allegedly had no flow after two attempts at aspiration and the catheter was withdrawn for external cleaning.It was further reported that post external cleaning, the wire with a balloon was intended to be used for vascular dilation and while attempting to advance the balloon, the balloon allegedly had difficulty in getting through.Furthermore, upon imaging, the helix was allegedly found to be broken into two segments and was difficult to be removed from the sheath.Reportedly, the broken segments were removed by using snare and nothing left inside the patient.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: the medical device manufacturer (d3) and manufacturing location (g1) for the straub product was selected as unknown due to system limitations.The correct medical device manufacturer and manufacturing location are straub medical us.H10: the catalog number identified in section d4 has not been cleared in the us but is similar to the rotarex products that are cleared in the us.The pro code and 510 k number for the rotarex products are identified in d2 and g4.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical sample was returned for evaluation and a physical investigation was performed for the catheter.The broken helix part was delivered outside of the catheter.The helix was broken at 47 cm from the tip of the catheter.No further physical damage was noted.Reported mechanical jam and other malfunctions were not tested due to helix break and therefore are not possible to confirm.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the helix break.However, the investigation is inconclusive for mechanical jam and retraction problem.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiry date: 05/2026), g3.H11: h6 (method, result, conclusion).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure, the catheter allegedly had no flow after two attempts at aspiration and the catheter was withdrawn for external cleaning.It was further reported that post external cleaning, the wire with a balloon was intended to be used for vascular dilation and while attempting to advance the balloon, the balloon allegedly had difficulty in getting through.Furthermore, upon imaging, the helix was allegedly found to be broken into two segments and was difficult to be removed from the sheath.Reportedly, the broken segments were removed by using snare and nothing left inside the patient.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|