• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 300 D; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH ERBE VIO 300 D; ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT Back to Search Results
Model Number VIO 300 D
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694); Full thickness (Third Degree) Burn (2696)
Event Date 09/19/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that a patient incident occurred with an electrosurgical unit (esu/generator).The esu was used in an ablation, diep, reduction mammaplasty, and sentinel lymphnode dissection procedure.The generator was used with a monopolar instrument as well as bipolar forceps (from sutter medical).Specific information involving the settings of the esu was not provided.While the monopolar instrument was being used, the bipolar forceps were placed on an abdominal cloth on the chest/neck area of the patient.After the procedure, medical personnel noticed a 2nd to 3rd degree burn of 2 cm x 1 cm in the cleavage/chest area of the patient.To address the issue, the wound was disinfected and treated with mepilex.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The esu was inspected/tested (note: the involved accessories were not available for an examination.).The unit was found to be working as intended.The evaluation included an electrical safety check, a functional check of each of the equipment's features and a power output check.The generator was/is within specifications and all features were/are functioning properly.In conclusion, no erbe equipment problem was found that would have caused or contributed to the incident.Based upon the limited information provided, it appears that the bipolar forceps that were placed on the patient (on the cloth which may have been damp) became unintentional activated (e.G., due to the auto-start function, whereby the forceps are activated as soon as the branches are in contact or touch conductive material).As a result, the burn occurred.The user manual of the electrosurgical unit explicitly warns against the unintentional activation or placing of hot instruments on the patient.The instruments must be stored in a safe place (sterile, dry, non-conductive, easily visible).However, no conclusive determination could be made as to the cause of the event.Erbe usa, inc.Is now closing the file on this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ERBE VIO 300 D
Type of Device
ELECTROSURGICAL UNIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse 17
tubingen, germany 72072
GM  72072
Manufacturer (Section G)
ERBE ELEKTROMEDIZIN GMBH
waldhornlestrasse 17
tubingen, germany 72072
GM   72072
Manufacturer Contact
john tartal
2225 northwest parkway
marietta, GA 30067-8764
7709554400
MDR Report Key17948540
MDR Text Key325803987
Report Number9610614-2023-00052
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GEI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
K060484
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/17/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberVIO 300 D
Device Catalogue Number10140-000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/26/2023
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/22/2023
Initial Date FDA Received10/17/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/22/2005
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age51 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight77 KG
-
-