• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: THORATEC CORPORATION HEARTMATE II LVAS IMPLANT KIT (WITH SEALED GRAFTS); VENTRICULAR (ASSIST) BYPASS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

THORATEC CORPORATION HEARTMATE II LVAS IMPLANT KIT (WITH SEALED GRAFTS); VENTRICULAR (ASSIST) BYPASS Back to Search Results
Model Number 106015
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Decreased Pump Speed (1500)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/02/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient had low speed advisory alarms on (b)(6) 2023.X-rays of the modular cable were performed, and they were put on an ungrounded cable.The customer reported that the patient was asymptomatic and experienced no further episodes after using an ungrounded.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer's investigation conclusion: review of the submitted log file confirmed low speed operation events while the patient was operating on the power module.Based on past experience with the heartmate ii left ventricular assist system (lvas) and similar reported events, this finding could be indicative of an issue with the driveline; however, a specific cause for this event could not be conclusively determined through this evaluation.The submitted log file contained events and data from (b)(6) 2023 through (b)(6) 2023, per the timestamps.Multiple low speed operation events were captured between (b)(6) 2023 and (b)(6) 2023 while the patient was operating on the power module.One of these events was associated with a low-speed hazard and low flow hazard alarm.The remainder of the file captured the pump operating at or above the low-speed limit.No other notable events or alarms were captured.The account indicated that the patient was asymptomatic and experienced no further episodes since using an ungrounded patient cable as of (b)(6) 2023.It was noted that the patient would be monitored.The account declined to provide any additional information.The patient remains ongoing on heartmate ii lvas, serial number (b)(6), with no further issues reported at this time.The relevant sections of the device history records for vad-19267, and driveline, serial number (b)(6), were reviewed and showed no deviations from manufacturing or quality assurance specification.The heartmate ii lvas instructions for use (ifu), is currently available.Section 6, ¿patient care and management¿, covers wear and tear to the driveline.Section 7, ¿alarms and troubleshooting¿, addresses system controller alarms (including low speed advisory and hazard alarms) and how to respond to such events.The heartmate ii lvas patient handbook, is also currently available.The patient handbook contains a section on ¿caring for the driveline¿; however, all heartmate ii lvad drivelines have the potential for wire/shield breakdown to occur dependent upon length of use and patient handling.Additionally, the patient handbook address hazard and advisory alarms, as well as how to respond to each alarm condition.No further information was provided.The manufacturer is closing the file on this event.
 
Event Description
Additional information reported that the patient underwent a pump exchange on (b)(6) 2023.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
No additional information has been provided.A supplemental report will be submitted once the manufacturer's investigation is complete.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer's investigation conclusion: evaluation of heartmate ii left ventricular assist system (lvas), serial number (b)(6), confirmed damage to all wires that would have contributed to the reported low speed operation events and associated alarms captured in the submitted log file.(b)(6) was returned assembled with the driveline severed approximately 4" from the pump housing.The remaining distal portion of the driveline was also returned.Rescue tape was present approximately 19.5-21.5" from the controller connector.Removal of this tape revealed damage to the underlying outer jacket approximately 20" from the controller connector.The pins of the controller connector appeared unremarkable.The apical sewing ring was not returned.The inflow conduit (inlet tube, inflow conduit flex section, and inlet elbow) was not returned.The outflow graft and outflow graft bend relief were also not returned.The outlet elbow was returned attached to the pump.No developed depositions or thrombus formations were identified upon disassembly of the device.The driveline was tested for electrical continuity in the condition that it was received and failed due to an electrical connection between all wires and the metal braided shield.Following careful removal of all layers, visual and microscopic inspection revealed breaches in all wires within an area approximately 5-6" from the pump housing.Although a specific cause could not conclusively be determined, the wire insulation breaches appeared to be the result of abrasion from the metal braided shield as a result of repetitive flexing of the driveline.The remaining areas of all wires appeared to be free of damage and were submerged in a saline bath solution for high potential (hi-pot) testing to further verify the integrity of each wire's insulation.This test did not reveal any additional areas of current leakage.If any of the exposed conductors of any wire made contact with the metal braided shield while operating on a grounded power source, a short-to-shield would have resulted, potentially contributing to the low-speed operation events and associated alarms observed within the submitted log file while the patient was operating on the power module.Furthermore, if any of the exposed conductors from wires of different motor phases made contact with each other, or simultaneous contact with the metal braided shield, a phase-to-phase short would have resulted, which would contribute to low-speed operation events on any power source.The relevant sections of the device history records for (b)(6), and driveline, serial number (b)(6), were reviewed and showed no deviations from manufacturing or quality assurance specification.The heartmate ii lvas instructions for use (ifu), is currently available.Section 6, ¿patient care and management¿, addresses how to care for the driveline and notes that the driveline should be inspected daily for signs of damage, such as cuts, holes, or tears.This section states that the driveline should never be severely bent or kinked.Section 7 of the ifu, "alarms and troubleshooting", outlines system controller alarms (including low speed alarms) and the appropriate actions associated with them.The heartmate ii lvas patient handbook, is also currently available.The patient handbook contains a section on ¿caring for the driveline¿; however, heartmate ii lvad drivelines have the potential for wire/shield breakdown to occur dependent upon length of use and patient handling.Additionally, the patient handbook address hazard and advisory alarms, as well as how to respond to each alarm condition.No further information was provided.The manufacturer is closing the file on this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HEARTMATE II LVAS IMPLANT KIT (WITH SEALED GRAFTS)
Type of Device
VENTRICULAR (ASSIST) BYPASS
Manufacturer (Section D)
THORATEC CORPORATION
6035 stoneridge drive
pleasanton CA 94588
Manufacturer (Section G)
THORATEC CORPORATION
6035 stoneridge drive
pleasanton CA 94588
Manufacturer Contact
bob fryc
6035 stoneridge drive
pleasanton, CA 94588
7818528204
MDR Report Key17961749
MDR Text Key326137520
Report Number2916596-2023-07263
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSQ
UDI-Device Identifier00813024011224
UDI-Public00813024011224
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeSN
PMA/PMN Number
P060040
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/02/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date11/30/2019
Device Model Number106015
Device Lot Number5855538
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/02/2023
Initial Date FDA Received10/18/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/16/2023
01/11/2024
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/08/2023
02/02/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/26/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age66 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight57 KG
-
-