|
Catalog Number LXMC15 |
Device Problems
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Pyrosis/Heartburn (1883); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 01/01/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 10/23/2023.B3: only event year known: 2023.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Lot number was received and dhr is pending review.When the review is completed, a supplemental medwatch will be sent with a summary of the evaluation.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: what was the date of implant? what symptoms lead to the discovery of the discontinuous device? when did they begin? what was the date of the imaging which showed the discontinuous linx? if available, please share a copy of this imaging.Please send to: productcompliant1@its.Jnj.Com was the device initially effective in controlling reflux? were any events associated with the onset of symptoms (vomiting, retching, trauma, surgery)? did the patient undergo an mri since device implant? if so, when was the mri and what strength? did the patient have any other surgeries in the area? was any additional imaging performed since device implant? does the device appear to be in a continuous annular state in these images? we are interested in establishing a window when the device may have become discontinuous.Please share any additional images.What is the management plan? is device removal scheduled? is a replacement linx or fundoplication planned? when and if the explanation takes place can we ask that the procedure gets video recorded and the video shared? when and if the linx device is removed, may we ask that the device be returned for analysis? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a linx device was disrupted/broken and explanted it on (b)(6) 2023.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 11/6/2023.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 3/5/2024.Investigation summary: a linx device with a visible weld ball that disconnected from a male bead case was returned to the analysis site.The link length and tensile force measurements were found to meet the applicable specifications during device analysis.The remaining device characteristics, excepting the visible weld ball, show no anomalies for a device that has been reasonably changed as part of the explant procedure, tooling marks were noted in some beads.The device was scanned using computer tomography (ct), optical microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy.The male bead case at the separation was measured and was greater than the specification.The male bead case was concentric with small amount of material displacement at the outer edge of the through hole.The overall appearance of the surface of the male bead case through hole didn¿t exhibit gross loss of shape.The top view of the diameter of the exposed weld ball was measured.This diameter is within the specification.The weld ball was concentric with the respect to the wire.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 20401 number, and no non-conformances related to the malfunction were identified.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4), date sent: 3/6/2024.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: patient symptoms: exertional gerd in 6 months following implantation, raised suspicions there was an issue with the procedure.Date of implant and removal.(b)(6) 2019 implant - (b)(6) 2023 explant.Reason for, patient was having ongoing gerd and physician had concern for erosion.Egd and explant exploration there were no signs of erosion.How was it diagnosed, x-ray? are there pictures/video? chest x-ray on (b)(6) 2021 discovered disrupted linx in the posterior aspect of the device.Clasp was fastened when discovered, clasp was still fastened upon inspection for removal.Did the patient have any dilations, egd or other procedures prior to discovery of discontinuous linx? dilation egd to 15mm a 6months post implant.Second egd on (b)(6) 2021, no dilation performed.Did the patient have another linx implanted? patient currently has no linx device or other les procedure.Dr.(b)(6) is willing to talk to medical affairs of necessary.Sounds like she may have some questions on the process of discovery/diagnosis of disrupted linx.To date, this is the only one she has dealt with.This is the only additional information i have on this event.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|