DEPUY MITEK LLC US VAPR PREMIERE 90 ELECTRODE -EA; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Catalog Number 227204 |
Device Problems
Display or Visual Feedback Problem (1184); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/06/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported by the sales rep in china that during an unspecified surgical procedure on (b)(6)23, the vapr premiere 90 electrode device jammed and had many bubbles.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There was no delay in the procedure reported.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: e3: reporter is a j&j sales representative.Udi: (b)(4).As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the vapr premiere 90 electrode ea was returned to manufacturer for evaluation.The manufacturer conducted visual inspection and functional test of device received by customer.The visual inspection and functional test of the device were performed, as a result; device was not returned in its original packaging.Device tip is in a used condition with procedural debris visible in suction hole as well as in the suction tube.The handle, cable and plug assemblies did not show defects.The device passed the electrical test, however the device failed on flow rate tests.The customer's device was manufactured in nov 2021.A dhr review has been performed for lot and no issues (ncrs or deviations) with the manufacturing process have been indicated which might explain the failures observed.Based on a review of the complaint investigation outcome no containment action related to the individual complaint is required.The customer stated the device 'jammed and with bubble'.The testing highlighted that the device failed to reach the minimum flow specification, therefore substantiating the customer complaint.A restriction was found at the distal end of the device and was caused by tissue debris underneath the active tip.From our investigation we were able to confirm the customer report that the electrode suction was jammed with the returned device.The device was found.To fail flow specifications due to a build-up of tissue debris at the distal end of the device which could not be cleared during testing.The complaint investigation shows the blockage experienced by the end user is confirmed and can be attributed to procedural tissue debris.No manufacturing defect was found with the returned device.The product instructions for use cautions not to allow the electrode to become covered in tissue debris.If this occurs, use a new electrode.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|