Section a2, a4 and a5: per regulation eu 2016/679 (general data protection regulation), patient identifiers were not collected or recorded and therefore are not available.Section d6b - explant date: not applicable, lens remains implanted, therefore not explanted.Section e1 - (b)(6).Section h3 - other (81): the intraocular lens (iol) was not returned for evaluation as it remains implanted.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review and possible product return and evaluation, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
Additional information: section h3 - device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the photograph provided by the customer was evaluated.The photograph displayed a lens in an eye.The haptics of the lens were together, but it could not be determined from a photographic assessment if the haptics were stuck together for any specific amount of time.No further evaluation could be performed.The complaint issue of haptic stuck to haptic was not confirmed during the photo evaluation.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|