Model Number 72404231 |
Device Problems
Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 10/09/2023 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the implanted inflatable penile prosthesis (ipp) was functional, but the sizing was not correct, it was too short.The patient had hypermobile glans.A revision surgery was performed.The cylinders and pump were replaced only.The old reservoir retained; new reservoir was implanted.The surgeon felt the option to keep the old reservoir implanted was safer than explanting it.There were no further patient complications.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the implanted inflatable penile prosthesis (ipp) was functional, but the sizing was not correct, it was too short.The patient had hypermobile glans.A revision surgery was performed.The cylinders and pump were replaced only.The old reservoir retained; new reservoir was implanted.The surgeon felt the option to keep the old reservoir implanted was safer than explanting it.There were no further patient complications.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
There was no device available for analysis; therefore, no physical or visual analysis of the product could be performed.The reported event could not be confirmed.Based on the analysis results, an investigation conclusion code of unintended use error caused or contributed to event was assigned to this investigation as incorrect size of the device may have caused the reported event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
D4.Model number, lot number, catalog number, expiration date and unique identifier (udi) # updated d10.Concomitant product/therapy updated h4.Device manufacture date updated h6.Evaluation method codes, evaluation result codes and evaluation conclusion codes updated.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the implanted inflatable penile prosthesis (ipp) was functional, but the sizing was not correct, it was too short.The patient had hypermobile glans.A revision surgery was performed.The cylinders and pump were replaced only.The old reservoir retained; new reservoir was implanted.The surgeon felt the option to keep the old reservoir implanted was safer than explanting it.There were no further patient complications.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the implanted inflatable penile prosthesis (ipp) was functional, but the sizing was not correct, it was too short.The patient had hypermobile glans.A revision surgery was performed.The cylinders and pump were replaced only.The old reservoir retained; new reservoir was implanted.The surgeon felt the option to keep the old reservoir implanted was safer than explanting it.There were no further patient complications.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Upon receipt of this inflatable penile prosthesis (ipp) at our quality assurance laboratory, the returned components underwent a thorough analysis.The cylinders and momentary squeeze (ms) pump were visually examined and functionally tested for leaks.Both cylinders had wear at a fold in the middle of the cylinders.Both cylinders passed the leak test.The ms pump was visually inspected, leak tested, and functionally tested.Ms pump passed visual inspection and there were no visual damages or anomalies found.Ms pump passed the leak test.Ms pump did not pass activation tests.Product analysis was unable to confirm the reported allegation.Based on the analysis results, an investigation conclusion code of cause not established was assigned to this investigation.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|