• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECKMAN COULTER IQ 200 URINE ANALYZER BODY FLUIDS MODULE; AUTOMATED URINALYSIS SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECKMAN COULTER IQ 200 URINE ANALYZER BODY FLUIDS MODULE; AUTOMATED URINALYSIS SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number IQ200 SELECT INSTRUMENT NON ROHS COMPLIANT
Device Problems Output Problem (3005); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 10/06/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The customer reported false negative results for urine rbc casts on two samples run on their iq200 select urinalysis instrument.No flags or error messages were generated by instrument.Of the two erroneous results, the customer reported that one resulted in a delay of patient treatment.Bec is attempting to gather additional information regarding the event.The investigation is ongoing.An updated report will be submitted once investigation is complete.Bec internal identifier: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Please refer to investigation results section for investigation details.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The customer contacted the customer technical support (cts) which directed him to update settings for formed particles in the unclassified (uncc) folder.It was noticed that the abnormal threshold in the instrument was set to 999 which is correct after instrument settings and logs were reviewed by subject matter expert (sme).The cts directed customer to set threshold to 0, so uncc for rbc casts particles will not be auto released, and technician must review them prior release.Then computer was restarted, and customer will monitor and call back if necessary.Additional information related to the instrument settings and a back up cd were gathered from the customer site and reviewed and analyzed by a bec application scientist and software engineer.The conclusion of the assessment is as follows: according to the iq200 instrument specification and ifu instruction for use (pn 300-4320), the user can manually classify (subclassify) the sub-category (rbc cast) particles from the uncc folder if the specific type of cast needs to be specified per the lab¿s protocol.The results with greater than abnormal threshold values will be flagged with h (high) does preventing from auto-release and will display yellow in the result view which require operator intervention.If the user follows the training, the algorithm prompts the user to review only yellow category.An investigation of the log files and settings demonstrates that there is no evidence that the uncc "abnormal threshold" value has changed to "999 /lpf" in comparison with the 2018 apui (analysis processor user interface) settings file.Additionally, a database query found that several sample results had uncc positive data, and these sample results were edited and transmitted by the lab operators/technicians.Bec internal identifier - (b)(6).At least one specimen id ((b)(6)) was abnormal, but user didn¿t sub-classify the casts and released as unclassified on 06-oct-2023.Approximately 10+ records were identified for similar cases.There is no evidence found for a non-conformance on the instrument.The flags are operating as designed and the instrument settings was found at an optimal setting.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that false negative results for urine rbc casts were generated on two samples run on their iq200 select urinalysis instrument.No flags were generated by instrument.The laboratory technician did not review the unclassified folder containing sample images and false erroneous results were released out of the lab.The customer reported that two erroneous patient results were released outside of the laboratory.Of the two erroneous results, the customer stated that one caused delay of patient treatment.That sample was retested afterward, and the unclassified folder was reviewed and moderate red blood cell casts were seen in the urine sample.Urine sample was cloudy and fresh.There were multiple attempts to acquire additional information regarding the allegation of delay of patient treatment from the customer.The customer stated he was not allowed to disclose information related to patient pre-existing conditions, diagnosis or treatment provided due to their hospital policies.However, he confirmed the doctor came to the lab the day the event occurred, and manually checked urine samples through microscope.The customer reported that that there was a delay of eight hours for patient treatment.An update regarding the patient condition was requested but not provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IQ 200 URINE ANALYZER BODY FLUIDS MODULE
Type of Device
AUTOMATED URINALYSIS SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECKMAN COULTER
lismeehan
o¿callaghan¿s mills
co. clare 0
EI  0
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECKMAN COULTER
1000 lake hazeltine dr.
chaska MN 55318
Manufacturer Contact
angela vettel
250 s. kraemer blvd.
brea, CA 92821
7149613625
MDR Report Key18017343
MDR Text Key326674498
Report Number2122870-2023-00092
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KQO
UDI-Device Identifier15099590695484
UDI-Public(01)15099590695484(11)NO-DATA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K022774
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/23/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberIQ200 SELECT INSTRUMENT NON ROHS COMPLIANT
Device Catalogue NumberC10684
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/06/2023
Initial Date FDA Received10/26/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received10/06/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/23/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/22/2018
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-