• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: JADA SYSTEM; INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

JADA SYSTEM; INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It initially drained 300 ml of blood, but did not control the bleeding/ device was not working [device ineffective].Case narrative: this spontaneous report originating from the united states was received from a physician via clinical account specialist (cas), referring to a non-pregnant female patient of unknown age.The patient's historical conditions were considered as pregnancy and delivery.Her current conditions included hospitalization and uterine artery bleeding.Her concomitant medications and past drugs/ allergies were not reported.This report concerned 1 patient and 1 device.On an unknown date, the patient had vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) placement via intravaginal route (lot# and expiration date were not reported) for postpartum hemorrhage by the reporting physician.Reportedly, after insertion, the device was connected to the suction, and it initially drained 300 milliliters (ml) of blood but did not control the bleeding and the physician felt device was not working (device ineffective) under ultrasound guidance and removed the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system).The physician believed the reason for the bleeding was related to a uterine artery bleed.The patient received several units of blood, exact amount was unknown and spent 2 weeks in the intensive care unit (icu) (considered as hospitalization prolonged).Reportedly, the patient sought medical attention and she did not have any documented prenatal care.Clinical account specialist (cas) does not have any patient or device information.All product quality complaint (pqc) answers were unknown by the reporter.Healthcare professional (hcp) does not wish to be contacted.No product quality complaint (pqc) identified.It was unknown if the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was available for evaluation.For vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) serial number was not provided.Upon internal review, the event of device ineffective was considered as serious due to medically significant.When the lot number is unknown, a technical investigation of the specific manufacturing process which includes review of records associated with a known lot number cannot be performed.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Based on the information we have received, there is no indication that the device malfunctioned.The device is assembled according to specifications.In process and finished product testing are performed and approved prior to release.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
JADA SYSTEM
Type of Device
INTRAUTERINE VACUUM CONTRACTION SYSTEM
Manufacturer Contact
30 hudson street
jersey city, NJ 07302
MDR Report Key18020266
MDR Text Key326700919
Report Number3002806821-2023-00127
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OQY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
510K K201199
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/27/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/27/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other;
Patient SexFemale
-
-