• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT MEDICAL REGENT HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT MEDICAL REGENT HEART VALVE; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK REGENT HEART VALVE
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Stroke/CVA (1770); Heart Block (4444)
Event Date 05/20/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
B3 - date of event is estimated.D4 - the udi number is not known as the part and lot numbers were not provided summarized patient outcomes/complications of mhv - regent (mechanical heart valve) were reported in a research article in a subject population with multiple co-morbidities including severe aortic stenosis and moderate aortic regurgitation.Some of the complications reported were stroke, unexpected medical intervention, heart block, and surgical intervention; these complications are anticipated for the procedure and subject population.A more comprehensive assessment could not be performed as the event was non-contemporaneously reported through a literature review and no device or individual patient information was received for analysis.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.
 
Event Description
The article, "aortic valve replacement in small aortic root- bi-leaflet mechanical valve is superior to a mono-leaflet mechanical valve", was reviewed.The article presented a retrospective, single center study to compare early and midterm outcomes following aortic valve replacement (avr) with a mono-leaflet (ml) valve and a bi-leaflet (bl) valve in a small aortic root.Devices included in the study were ttk chitra valve (mono-leaflet/ ml group) or st.Jude medical valve (bi-leaflet/ bl group).The article concluded that aortic valve replacement without any root widening procedure, using a small-sized mechanical valve provides acceptable early outcomes.Bi-leaflet mechanical valves provide better hemodynamics and survival percentage.The primary and corresponding author was (b)(6).The time frame of the study was from 01 january 2017 to 31 december 2019.A total of 98 patients were included in this study, of which 56 received an abbott device.The average age was 53.38 years in the ml group and 53.52 years in the bl group.The average gender was male.Comorbidities included severe aortic stenosis and moderate aortic regurgitation.Peri- and post-procedural complications included stroke, permanent pacemaker implant (surgical intervention), heart block, intra-aortic balloon pump support (unexpected medical intervention.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
REGENT HEART VALVE
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT MEDICAL
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL PUERTO RICO, INC. REG#2648612
20 b st caguas west park
caguas 00725
*   00725
Manufacturer Contact
karen krouse
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth, MN 55442
6517565400
MDR Report Key18030342
MDR Text Key326860161
Report Number2135147-2023-04756
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
P810002
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/30/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/30/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK REGENT HEART VALVE
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/10/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Disability; Required Intervention;
-
-