The bleeding appeared to be controlled and at a later time while the jada was still in place, the patient had a ¿gush¿ of about 1000 ml of blood for reasons unknown to the nurse who reported it.The patient ended up having a hysterectomy.[device effect incomplete] case narrative: this initial spontaneous report originating from the united states was received from a registered nurse via company representative, referring to a female patient of unknown age.The patient's medical history was considered as pregnancy and delivery.Her concurrent conditions, past drugs, allergies and concomitant medications were not reported.This report concerned 1 patient and 1 device.On an unknown date, the patient was inserted with vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) via an unknown route for postpartum hemorrhage.The bleeding appeared to be controlled and at a later time while the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was still in place, the patient had a ¿gush¿ of about 1000 ml of blood for reasons unknown to the nurse who reported it.The patient ended up having a hysterectomy (device effect incomplete).Reportedly, the patient sought medical attention.It was unknown if the vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system) was available for evaluation.For vacuum-induced hemorrhage control system (jada system), lot number and serial number were not provided.Upon internal review, the event of device effect incomplete was determined to be serious due to required intervention.When the lot number is unknown, a technical investigation of the specific manufacturing process which includes review of records associated with a known lot number cannot be performed.Medical device reporting criteria: serious injury.
|