• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND RESOLUTE ONYX RX; CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND RESOLUTE ONYX RX; CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Myocardial Infarction (1969); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 12/02/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Journal article: durable polymer versus biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention: a post hoc analysis of the host-rp-acs.Year: 2022 ref:doi:10.4244/eij-d-22-00372 a2: average age a3: majority gender b3: date of publication medication: aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
A journal article was submitted for review titled; durable polymer versus biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention: a post hoc analysis of the host-reduce-polytech-acs trial.This study sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of durable polymer drug-eluting stents (dp-des) and biodegradable polymer (bp) des (bp-des), in acs patients receiving complex percutaneous coronary intervention (pci).Medtronic resolute onyx coronary drug eluting stents were amongst a number of stents used in the dp-des group.Complex pci was defined as a high-risk procedure with at least 1 of the following features: =3 stents implanted, =3 lesions treated, bifurcation pci with 2 stents, total stent length =60 mm, left main pci, or heavy calcification.The primary outcome was a patient-oriented composite outcome (poco) at 12 months.The poco was a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (mi), and any repeat revascularization.The secondary outcome was a device-oriented composite outcome (doco) at 12 months, including cardiac death, target vessel mi, and target lesion revascularization (tlr).The individual outcomes of the composite outcomes, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization (tvr), and non-tvr were also evaluated.Complete procedural data were available in 3,301 patients with 72 patients lost to follow-up.Based on the procedural data, patients were categorized into those who received complex pci (1,140 patients) and those who received non-complex pci (2,161 patients).Among patients in the complex pci group, 675 patients had a total stent length of 60 mm or longer, 518 patients had heavily calcified lesions, 514 patients had 3 or more stents, 259 patients had 3 or more lesions treated, 224 patients underwent bifurcation pci with 2 stents, and 158 patients underwent left main (lm) pci.Lesions being treated included the lm, left anterior descending artery, left circumflex artery, and the right coronary artery.Among patients in the complex pci group, 570 patients were allocated to the dp-des group and 570 patients to the bp-des group.In those who received non-complex pci, 1,088 patients were assigned to the dp-des group and 1,073 patients to the bp-des group.Clinical outcomes at 12 month follow up in both complex and non-complex dp-des groups included poco, doco, all cause death, cardiac death, non-fatal mi, target vessel mi, stent thrombosis, repeat revascularization, tvr, tlr, and non-tvr.Patients who underwent complex pci had a higher risk of poco and doco at 12 months compared to those who underwent non-complex pci.There was no significant difference at 12 months between patients receiving dp-des and bp-des for both complex and non-complex pci groups.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: annex d code.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RESOLUTE ONYX RX
Type of Device
CORONARY DRUG-ELUTING STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key18046999
MDR Text Key327060361
Report Number9612164-2023-04963
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
PMA/PMN Number
P160043
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/15/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/01/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/09/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Other;
Patient Age65 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-