• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SWAN-GANZ BIPOLAR PACING CATHETER; ELECTRODE, PACEMAKER TEMPORARY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES SWAN-GANZ BIPOLAR PACING CATHETER; ELECTRODE, PACEMAKER TEMPORARY Back to Search Results
Model Number PE075F5
Device Problem Pacing Problem (1439)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that during use of this swan-ganz bipolar pacing catheter, it was unable to pace.Pacing was attempted after the catheter insertion, but it did not work.The issue was resolved by replacing the catheter.Information including the kind of surgery or examination the catheter was used for and if the patient had cardiac conduction defect was unknown.The patient demographic information was requested but unavailable.There were no patient complications reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Our product evaluation lab received one model pe075f5 catheter.The customers report of pacing issue was confirmed.A continuity test found that a full open condition of the proximal circuit in y-adapter.The distal circuit was found to be continuous.There was no open or short condition was observed in the lead wires between just distal side of y-adapter and the electrodes.A short condition was not detected in the circuit proximal of y-adapter.There was no visible damage or abnormality was observed from catheter body, balloon, windings, and returned syringe.The balloon inflated clear and concentric and remained inflated for five min without leakage.An engineering evaluation was initiated to assess for any manufacturing-related processes which could be correlated to the complaint.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as a part of the monthly review.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An engineering evaluation was completed to assess for any manufacturing related processes which could be correlated to the complaint.It could not be confirmed that the failure condition being evaluated is associated to design or the manufacturing process or that there was a product non conformance that potentially contributed to the complaint.A device history record review was completed and documented that device met all specifications upon distribution.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SWAN-GANZ BIPOLAR PACING CATHETER
Type of Device
ELECTRODE, PACEMAKER TEMPORARY
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
samantha eveleigh
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492017706
MDR Report Key18047451
MDR Text Key327065859
Report Number2015691-2023-17183
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LDF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K813521
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/01/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberPE075F5
Device Lot Number64780027
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/26/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/13/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/16/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-