MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US VAPR TRIPOLAR 90 SUCTION ELECT; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES

Catalog Number 225028

Device Problem Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)

Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)

Event Date 10/24/2023

Event Type  malfunction  

Manufacturer Narrative

This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: e3: reporter is a j&j sales representative.D4: the expiration date is currently unavailable.H4: the device manufacture date is currently unavailable.Udi: (b)(4).As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.

Event Description

It was reported by the sales rep in switzerland that during an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2023, it was observed that the vapr tripolar90 suction electrode device stopped working.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.

Manufacturer Narrative

This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.The actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.

Manufacturer Narrative

This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Type of investigation, component code: the type of investigation code and component code has been updated.

Manufacturer Narrative

This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary
=
> the device was received and evaluated.Visual inspection revealed that the electrode is in normal use condition.The cable is in good condition as well as the connector and pins.The suction tube shows saline residues.The active tip shows signs of activation.When connected to the test generator, the electrode was immediately recognized.When performing the functional test, the ablation and the coagulation functions were able to work.The electrode will be sent to the manufacturer for further analysis and suction test.Manufacturer evaluation result for vapr tripolar 90 suction elect: tip is in a used condition with tissue debris around the active tip and in the suction holes.Tip components are in good condition.Handle assembly is in good condition.Cable and plug assembly are in good condition.Electrical test: the device passed all parameters.Functional test: the device failed the flow rate test.The customer stated that the suction stops during operations.Visual inspection recorded that the suction holes were blocked by tissue debris.The complaint was substantiated with the device being unable to achieve the minimum flow specification.The blockage was at the valve area and at the distal end of the device and caused by tissue debris.The device was found to fail flow specifications both before and after activation.This was due to procedural debris in the distal end and in the valve area.Valve area blockage could not be removed during the investigation, and it was needed to introduce a thin gauge wire in the suction tube to locate this blockage.No manufacturing defect was found with the returned device.The product ifu cautions not to allow the electrode to become covered in tissue debris.If this occurs, use a new electrode.The product ifu warns electrodes will wear from normal use, dependent on factors such as length of use, high tissue removal rate, prolonged use against bony surfaces, prolonged use in saline, high power settings, and use with minimal suction or fluid management.Periodically assess electrode tip for wear and proper operation.Replace the electrode if excessive wear is noted.Therefore, the observed failure can be attributable to end user misuse.Given that lot number was not provided, the manufacturing record evaluation (mre) review cannot be performed.If the lot number becomes available, the mre review will be performed.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.

• Brand Name: VAPR TRIPOLAR 90 SUCTION ELECT
• Type of Device: ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
• Manufacturer (Section D): DEPUY MITEK LLC US; 325 paramount drive; raynham MA 02767
• Manufacturer (Section G): DEPUY MITEK LLC US; 325 paramount drive; raynham MA 02767
• Manufacturer Contact: kate karberg ; 325 paramount drive; raynham, MA 02767 ; 3035526892
• MDR Report Key: 18055691
• MDR Text Key: 327166142
• Report Number: 1221934-2023-03984
• Device Sequence Number: 1
• Product Code: GEI
• UDI-Device Identifier: 10886705023103
• UDI-Public: 10886705023103
• Combination Product (y/n): N
• Reporter Country Code: SZ
• PMA/PMN Number: K143475
• Number of Events Reported: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Report Source: Manufacturer
• Source Type: Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
• Reporter Occupation: Other
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
• Report Date: 11/02/2023

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Date FDA Received: 11/02/2023
• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: No
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: Yes
• Device Operator: Health Professional
• Device Catalogue Number: 225028
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: Device Returned to Manufacturer
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: No
• Date Manufacturer Received: 01/30/2024
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer?: Yes
• Is the Device Single Use?: Yes
• Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device?: No
• Type of Device Usage: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1