• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVIS & GECK CARIBE LTD ENDO CLIP II; CLIP, IMPLANTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVIS & GECK CARIBE LTD ENDO CLIP II; CLIP, IMPLANTABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number 176657
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/16/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, prior to start the case, when the surgeon used the clip applier it was not clamping and firing closed on targeted tissue, when the surgeon squeezes the handle, the clip dislodges completely unclamped.A new device was used to resolve the issue.There was no patient injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: h6 (rfr, fdd) additi9onal information: d9, g3, h3, h6 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted that the jaws would not close upon actuation of the handle.The instrument body was removed from the shaft and disassembled for visualization of internal components and revealed that the firing handle linkage was forced through the channel tube lugs, suggesting that the instrument had been fired through the safety interlock.It was reported that the clip applier was not clamping and firing closed on targeted tissue.The clip dislodges completely unclamped.The reported issues were confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.This issue can occur under the following conditions.When the firing handle has not been allowed to fully return to the home position after forming a previous clip.A single continuous handle compression is one of two firing methods described in the information booklet which accompanies each product shipment, if the handle is compressed at an accelerated rate, clips do not have enough time to enter the jaws and the instrument will lock preventing the jaws from closing without a clip.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: confirm that the clip is positioned within the jaws and is free of other clips or obstructions before squeezing the handle to close the clip.However, rather than forceful compression of the firing handle under these circumstances, if the firing handle is fully released by relieving hand pressure, the interlock feature will disengage, the next clip will load, and the clip can be applied.Furthermore; if an attempt is made to forcibly fire the instrument while engaged in interlock after all the clips has been fired, the lugs are designed to break as noted.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDO CLIP II
Type of Device
CLIP, IMPLANTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVIS & GECK CARIBE LTD
zona franca de san isidro
santo domingo 0101
DR  0101
Manufacturer (Section G)
DAVIS & GECK CARIBE LTD
zona franca de san isidro
santo domingo 0101
DR   0101
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key18069864
MDR Text Key327407702
Report Number9612501-2023-01924
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FZP
UDI-Device Identifier10884521057869
UDI-Public10884521057869
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K143644
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/04/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number176657
Device Catalogue Number176657
Device Lot NumberJ3G1280NY
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/16/2023
Initial Date FDA Received11/03/2023
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/10/2023
12/12/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/06/2023
01/04/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/04/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age29 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight88 KG
-
-