While it is unknown if the device used in this case caused or contributed to the patient¿s symptoms, it is possible as allergic reactions to dental materials are known and reported, with medical consequences being dependent upon the severity of the individual allergic response and subsequent exposure to the same material.Therefore, this event meets the criteria for reportability per 21 cfr part 803.The device was not returned for evaluation.However, the lot/order number was provided and retained-product testing and/or dhr review are the investigation is based in the manufacturing process of aligners, retainers, templates.Dhr evaluation: we reviewed the dhr for this (b)(4) / patient id# (b)(6) / practice id# 15139 qty.2 items assy-500015 (retainers), were packaged by of second shift by bag and box operation on march 18, 2023, manufacturing cell 3, equipment bag-6.The sales order was inspected and met with the acceptance criteria provided by qa.Incoming inspection.We reviewed the incoming inspection record for the material used to manufacture this (b)(4).Raw material: 1apl40c125-orx / lot# 06627538 / qty.Received = 25,976 pcs, inspection date: (b)(6) 2023.The material was found to be acceptable for use in the manufacture of the sure smile product.Evidence (allergic reaction checklist).In the evidence provided by the customer (allergic reaction checklist), the patient declares not to suffer from any type of allergy.The patient was not tested for allergies to the product.Conclusion: after reviewing the records generated during the manufacturing process (dhr), incoming inspection and allergic reaction checklist.We found no failure in the manufacturing process.
|
In this event it is reported that a patient experienced an allergic reaction to suresmile retainer.The patient developed redness, dryness and pain in the lips after wearing the retainer.The patient used/was prescribed topical and systemic steroids, topical creams and oral rinses to help resolve the symptoms.The patient has no known allergies.
|