|
Catalog Number 6393190 |
Device Problems
Fluid/Blood Leak (1250); Fracture (1260)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 10/25/2023 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately one month post a dialysis catheter placement, the extension leg of dialysis catheter allegedly broke.Reportedly, the catheter was removed and replaced.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the device is pending.However, photo was provided for review.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 02/2025).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that approximately one month post a dialysis catheter placement, the extension leg of dialysis catheter was allegedly broken.Reportedly, the catheter was removed and replaced.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one 19cm glidepath d/l catheter in two segment was received and one photo was provided for review.Visual, microscopic, and functional evaluations were performed.The photo (unnamed.Jpg) shows the dialysis catheter implanted in the patient with sutures.Upon infusion of the blue luer, a leak from the bifurcate was noted.A break from the bifurcation was noted in the blue luer extension leg.Therefore the investigation is confirmed for the reported fracture and confirmed for identified leak issue.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: (expiration date: 02/2025).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|