• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL CIRCULATION AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100; CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR Back to Search Results
Model Number MODEL 100
Device Problem Visual Prompts will not Clear (2281)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 10/30/2023
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported complaint of the autopulse platform sn (b)(6) "displayed user advisory (ua) 07 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large) error message" was confirmed during the initial functional testing and archive data review.The root cause of the (ua) 07 was due to the failed load cell module.The damaged front enclosure and failed load cell were likely attributed to mishandling such as a drop.The load cell was replaced to remedy the fault.Upon visual inspection, unrelated to the reported complaint, observed a cracked front enclosure, likely attributed to user mishandling, such as a drop.The front enclosure was replaced to remedy the problem.A review of the archive data showed multiple (ua) 07 error messages to have occurred around the customer's reported event date, thus confirming the reported complaint.The autopulse platform failed the initial functional testing due to the (ua) 07 error message displayed upon powering on, thus confirming the customer complaint.During the power-on-self-test, the load sensing system detected a weight or load imbalance between the two load cells.The load cell characterization test results confirmed a failed load cell module 2.The load cell module 2 was replaced to remedy the (ua) 07 error.The autopulse platform passed the run-in test using the 95% patient large resuscitation test fixture (lrtf) with good known test batteries for 15 minutes without any fault or error.A load cell characterization test was performed and confirmed that both cell modules function within the specification.Waiting on the customer's approval for service repair.Historical complaints were reviewed for service information related to the reported complaint, and there were no similar complaints reported for the autopulse platform with sn (b)(6).
 
Event Description
As reported, the autopulse platform sn (b)(6) displayed a user advisory (ua) 07 (discrepancy between load 1 and load 2 too large) message that could not be cleared.No further information was provided.It is unknown when the problem occurred.However, patient use information was requested, but no additional information was provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AUTOPULSE® RESUSCITATION MODEL 100
Type of Device
CARDIAC CHEST COMPRESSOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL CIRCULATION
2000 ringwood ave.
san jose CA 95131
Manufacturer Contact
kim nguyen
2000 ringwood ave
san jose, CA 95131
4084192922
MDR Report Key18189283
MDR Text Key328745742
Report Number3010617000-2023-00982
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRM
UDI-Device Identifier00849111000512
UDI-Public00849111000512
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K112998
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/21/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberMODEL 100
Device Catalogue Number8700-0730-01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/08/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/30/2023
Initial Date FDA Received11/22/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2020
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-