MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US VAPR TRIPOLAR 90 SUCTION ELECT; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES

Catalog Number 225028

Device Problem Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)

Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)

Event Date 11/08/2023

Event Type  malfunction  

Event Description

It was reported by the sales rep in switzerland that during an unspecified surgical procedure on an unknown date vapr tripolar 90 suction elect device stopped working after 2 minutes and its suction did not work with cleaning of the tip and pushing water through the electrode.It was not reported if another like device was used to complete the procedure or if there was a delay in the procedure reported.It is not known if there were adverse patient consequences reported.No additional information was provided.

Manufacturer Narrative

This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: e3: reporter is a j&j sales representative.H4: the device manufacture date is currently unavailable.Device evaluation: as of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.Udi: (b)(4).

Manufacturer Narrative

This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: this report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: d9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.

Manufacturer Narrative

This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.H10 additional narrative: the visual inspection and functional test of the device were performed, as a result; the tip is in a used condition with tissue debris around the active tip and the suction holes, the handle assembly, cable and plugs were in good condition.Procedural residue were visible in suction tube.The device passed all the electrical checks.The flow rate test before and after activation were not passed.Coagulation and ablation function worked as intended.A dhr review has been performed for the complaint device lot number.No issues with the manufacturing process have been identified which could attribute to the complaint in question.From our investigation we were able to confirm the customer report that the electrode suction would not work with the returned complaint device.The device was found to fail flow specifications both before and after activation due to a build-up of tissue debris in the distal end of the electrode which could not be removed during the investigation.No manufacturing defect was found with the returned device.The product instructions for use cautions not to allow the electrode to become covered in tissue debris.If this occurs, use a new electrode.The product instructions for use warns electrodes will wear from normal use, dependent on factors such as length of use, high tissue removal rate, prolonged use against bony surfaces, prolonged use in saline, high power settings, and use with minimal suction or fluid management.Periodically assess electrode tip for wear and proper operation.Replace the electrode if excessive wear is noted.Based on a review of the investigation findings and risk documentation no correction action has been implemented.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.

• Brand Name: VAPR TRIPOLAR 90 SUCTION ELECT
• Type of Device: ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
• Manufacturer (Section D): DEPUY MITEK LLC US; 325 paramount drive; raynham MA 02767
• Manufacturer (Section G): DEPUY MITEK LLC US; 325 paramount drive; raynham 02767
• Manufacturer Contact: kate karberg ; 325 paramount drive; raynham, MA 02767 ; 3035526892
• MDR Report Key: 18193721
• MDR Text Key: 328985329
• Report Number: 1221934-2023-04283
• Device Sequence Number: 1
• Product Code: GEI
• UDI-Device Identifier: 10886705023103
• UDI-Public: 10886705023103
• Combination Product (y/n): N
• Reporter Country Code: SZ
• PMA/PMN Number: K143475
• Number of Events Reported: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Report Source: Manufacturer
• Source Type: Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
• Reporter Occupation: Other
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup,Followup
• Report Date: 11/08/2023

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Date FDA Received: 11/22/2023
• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: No
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: Yes
• Device Operator: Health Professional
• Device Catalogue Number: 225028
• Device Lot Number: U2307005
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: Device Returned to Manufacturer
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: No
• Date Manufacturer Received: 01/31/2024
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer?: Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
• Date Device Manufactured: 07/04/2023
• Is the Device Single Use?: Yes
• Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device?: Yes
• Type of Device Usage: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1