• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ABBOTT MEDICAL EPIC¿ VALVE (AORTIC); HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ABBOTT MEDICAL EPIC¿ VALVE (AORTIC); HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK EPIC STENTED PORCINE HV
Device Problem Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Patient Problems Endocarditis (1834); Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Embolism/Embolus (4438); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
Event Date 01/01/2003
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The article, "bovine pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic aortic valves: a nationwide population-based cohort study in korea", was reviewed.The article presented a retrospective, multicenter study to compare the clinical outcomes of aortic valve replacement using bovine pericardial and porcine bioprostheses, utilizing a nationwide administrative claims database.Devices included in this study were hancock ii valve, mosaic valve, sjm epic valve, sjm epic supra valve, sjm bicor porcine valve, toronto spv valve, soprano pericardial heart valve, carpentier edwards perimount magna tfx valve, carpentier edwards perimount valve, pericarbon more pericardial heart valve, avalus bioprosthesis, trifecta valve, mitroflow aortic pericardial heart valve/crown prt aortic heart valve, intuity elite valve system, and perceval s.The article concluded in this large nationwide cohort study of patients undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement utilization of porcine prostheses was significantly associated with an increased risk of reoperation than that of bovine prostheses, supporting previous findings.[the primary and corresponding author was joon bum kim, department of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, asan medical center, university of ulsan college of medicine, olympic-ro 43-gil, songpa-gu, 20 seoul, 05505, republic of korea, with corresponding email: jbkim1975@amc.Seoul.Kr].
 
Manufacturer Narrative
D4 - the udi number is not known as the part and lot numbers were not provided.Summarized patient outcomes/complications comparing bovine with porcine valve replacement outcomes were reported in a research article.Some of the complications reported were endocarditis, reoperation, thromboembolism, hemorrhage, and hospitalization.A more comprehensive assessment could not be performed as the event was non-contemporaneously reported through a literature review and no device or individual patient information was received for analysis.There is no indication of a product quality issue with regards to manufacture, design, or labeling.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EPIC¿ VALVE (AORTIC)
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ABBOTT MEDICAL
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
ST. JUDE MEDICAL #3014918977
edificio #44 calle 0, ave. 2
el coyol alajuela 1897- 4050
CS   1897-4050
Manufacturer Contact
karen krouse
5050 nathan lane n
plymouth, MN 55442
6517565400
MDR Report Key18212619
MDR Text Key329045904
Report Number2135147-2023-05198
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeKS
PMA/PMN Number
P040021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/27/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK EPIC STENTED PORCINE HV
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/04/2023
Initial Date FDA Received11/27/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-