The device was subject to an on-site investigation whereby the reported ventilator failure could be confirmed.The entire ventilator unit was replaced; the device passed all consecutive tests and could be returned to use.Log file and replaced parts were analysed in the manufacturer's lab.The validity of the on-site expertise can be confirmed as well as the appropriateness of the repair measure can - there are collector positions where the motor does not provide mechanic power due to contact interrupts to the carbon brushes; speed fluctuations will be the consequence.The speed fluctuations result in a deviation between measured and expected piston position.The piston hub defines the applied tidal volume and thus, to prevent from potentially hazardous output and/or from damages to the ventilator unit, the system is designed to shut down automatic ventilation and to alert the user to this condition by means of a corresponding alarm.As confirmed for the particular case, manual ventilation and the monitoring functions remain available to the full extent.Dräger finally concludes that the device behaved as specified upon the malfunction of a single component; no patient consequences have been reported.There is no similar case for this type of motor known; the case is considered a single event.
|